Ask HN: Why haven't bookmarks been re-invented?
Perhaps I'm not in the know, but I find it hard to imagine that we encounter a site, we bookmark it into what's often a poorly self-curated / organized taxonomy, and then rarely ever go back to it, what do other people do to manage their bookmarks, or to even share them? I love "awesome lists" as well, which are often just a bunch of well organized bookmarks anyways, so what do people do that's better than this?
137 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 198 ms ] thread...how?! Why?!
I'm pretty sure my maximum was ~15 tabs.
1: That is an understatement - easy as in, 100% automatic and subconscious, like taking a breath. Think about how fast you’ll rack up 7.5k breaths. It’s not a big number.
I still use Firefox in part because the bookmark tagging and the awesomebar work marginally better than what Chrome does.
Browsers and web UI have gotten dumbed down since even the more power-user oriented days of Firefox and prevalence of RSS.
I think not. Bookmark.
I think bookmarks fail because they are buried away and not front and centre, and they mix the concepts of “notes for future reference” and “regularly visited favourite sites”.
I paid for the archival and all, but I'm moving my stuff to raindrop and seriously considering self-hosting something.
Any reinvention would have to incorporate search and keep track of sufficient content from the page to do a search for its new location. Either that or link to 3rd party content storage (i.e. archive.org et.al.)
Surprisingly, many of them go back to the 20th century, and a few even to 1995, when I was running Mosaic on SCO Unix.
Now that disk space is so cheap I've been archiving many of the old links to local storage. A really nice bookmark function would do that automatically, but most modern browser interfaces seem to be following Chrome's lead and shuffling bookmarks off into a submenu ghetto as everything turns into a kiosk-style UI.
Disclaimer: I work at Microsoft, but not in Edge.
[1]: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/organize-...
"Social bookmarking" started with deli.co.us and has largely been subsumed by reddit.
Beyond some level of complexity, Evernote, Obsidian, Notion, etc become bookmarking tools
...but the ultimate place to find the bookmark managers are in the Chrome and Firefox extension stores:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/extensions/category...
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/search/bookmark?_category...
There doesn't seem to be any money at all in this space, and any really groundbreaking innovation will be folded in by the browser vendors, so I don't expect there to be much more thwn what's already here.
GitHub is the logical place for an “awesome react” list even if it’s not necessarily intended for that.
Can also piggyback off / strangler fig existing website structure. Ex. bookmarks to titles on goodreads.
Add in a similarity graph (people also bookmarked x), and a democratic way to merge bookmarks that point to the same object.
And if you want to get really nutso, add a resource management system where ppl pay for attention - mint bookmarks as NFTs, commenting has a cost, invest in a bookmark to boost global visibility and get a % of commenting cost
1- We keep the r/whatever (subject matter) stream like view
2- We can always have that enhanced "saved bookmarks" view you talked about. They are not mutually exclusive.
3- To expand on your "reference page" (Wikipedia-like) idea, the bookmarks should be more malleable: We ought to be able to collaborate on reorganizing them under different tag-systems/hierarchies (while they keep their original comments and score)
So it is 3 complementary views: stream view (current Reddit/HN link-posts), personal view (current bookmark managers), and reference view (a more structured “awesome lists”)
Most sites do have at least two (mostly 1+2), but one at least is always rudimentary (like the HN favourites). I myself tried to combine 2+3 (for a private team) using the coda raindrop pack https://coda.io/packs/raindrop-io-11475
I'm coming at it from the direction, where I see the primary action as "collecting" / "cultivating". Ex.
1. See an article you like
2. add it to bookmarks/instantiate the global bookmark
3. curate it a bit - add an archive link, some tags, link to related article
and then the reward is
4. get notified when someone else bookmarks it + comments, a week or a month later
so the inversion is - on HN/reddit, something gets posted once and there's a big discussion and it disappears. this is the opposite where the page grows over time
How did your project turn out?
Yesterday, a Show HN [1] was an RSS reader that displays related HN/Redddit comments. I can imagine bookmark managers alerting you in a similar fashion. It will not be as integrated as you specified (single thread by link...), but the scale will be much bigger : Theoretically you can link it (crawl/api) to any site, then you get a dashboard+notification on your existing bookmarks for new
- discussion threads (HN/Reddit...)
- annotations/notes (Hypothesis.is...)
- reviews (alternativeto.net...)
My coda/raindrop "project" is just a "doc template" we use sometimes to organize bookmarks in a small team. It is not supposed to scale beyond that. Many Coda features [2] come handy.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34188734
[2] like voting, grouping columns, collapsing outlines, hover cards, and word/tag clouds
If you’re developing a reading habit in 2023, give it a try.
[0]: https://ktool.io
My most favorite routine now is to subscribe to Hacker News RSS[0] and read top posts on my Kindle. Best of both worlds to me since HN could be quite addictive and unproductive sometimes
[0]: https://hnrss.github.io/
I've been strongly preferring methods that let me tag items and have a good search - either in addition to or instead of putting them in a folder. If I don't like the "taxonomy" I can just add more tags, instead of constantly trying to figure out the one folder where everything should go.
I can share by creating an additional visitor user, or use the import/export commands. I hope those get built into the UI sometime, but I rarely share more than a single bookmark at a time.
It is an extra step to copy/paste links into Shiori versus browser built-in features, but I prefer not to trust or rely on browsers for my bookmarks unless at work. Seems like everyone wants sync those to accounts without my explicit consent.
Also - make use of your address bar’s search functionality. Bookmarking as implemented is still useful.
Seems like something a librarian might enjoy though heh.
Linkblogging used to be a thing people did in the heydey of early 2000s blogging. Now it's mostly lost as a form. The spirit of it lives though in the way Mastodon, Slack, Facebook, etc make it easy to share a link and have a preview for it. What's missing is an archival backup view of that sharing. Pinboard gives me mine, but I seldom use it other than to search for something specific I vaguely remember.
If something is ONLY relevant to me in a work context at my work web browser I will store it as a bookmark there.
If something is related to one of my broader life projects, like it makes me take a different perspective on that thing, then I take the time to open up Google Keep, write a blurb about my new perspective, link the article, and tag it accordingly.
I've been contemplating moving these to Obsidian so that the notes can be aggregated and cross-linked, but I am noticing friction where this defeats the abstract point of bookmarks where they are "dump and go". Probably I want to keep using Keep but then have periodic checkins where I move everything from Keep into Obsidian and delete it from Keep?