3 comments

[ 1.6 ms ] story [ 20.0 ms ] thread
Nah, they’ll only live as long as their least trustworthy staff or least reliable part lets them. Or the ship of Theseus kicks in and disqualifies the android/ai from claiming it’s the same person. Doctor who had fun with this.

Perhaps better to say that the momentum of massive piles of money continue independent of their purported driver.

I think this idea is naïve.

The progress of medicine have never been perfectly distributed, but they are mostly widely available after a relatively short time.

I don't see why any process of life extension would not follow the same pattern.

The power of wealthy/powerful individuals is directly related to how many less wealthy individuals are willing to work for them in exchange of money/power.

A rising tide is lifting all the boats.

If you take the opposite stance, would reducing humanity lifespan be a good thing to fight inequality?

I think this is the opposite, regardless of income/wealth/power distribution, at the individual level, a longer lifespan would increase freedom and real wealth.

Wealth already compounds forever due to inheritance.