However it's clear we are years and years of development away from this actually being relevant over conventional tools. It really seems like were just giving money to Microsoft for developing what will ultimately just be internal patents going towards consumer or business facing products in the nearer term.
Geeze, why don't they go for MagicLeap 2 Enterprise edition ($?) or Meta Quest Pro ($1500)?
Also, I think the sticker shock is there but it depends on the value it brings.
If it's well-justified to bring a major advantage, then it's acceptable. Otherwise it looks like MIC wasting $$$ on toys when there's unmet social and health needs that are desperately underfunded.
As I understand these IVAS headsets bear very little relation to the commercial hololens devices. I'm not saying Microsoft aren't doing this for a healthy profit, but there's a significant amount of engineering work for relatively small production numbers, and most of it would not be transferable to the consumer and business segment hololens gear. At least initially probably blocked for sale to other friendly militaries as well.
Even simple things like repackaging and ruggedising COTS hardware to pass shock/vibration standards, weatherproofing it for a range of adverse conditions, etc. is a reasonable cause to add "military grade" markup.
Years ago on yt the Boston Dynamics robodog was demoed at a targetted $20k a unit. In place of one set of Hololens you send two robodogs on a oneway trip to the Army's field.
13 comments
[ 0.18 ms ] story [ 41.0 ms ] threadHowever it's clear we are years and years of development away from this actually being relevant over conventional tools. It really seems like were just giving money to Microsoft for developing what will ultimately just be internal patents going towards consumer or business facing products in the nearer term.
Also, I think the sticker shock is there but it depends on the value it brings.
If it's well-justified to bring a major advantage, then it's acceptable. Otherwise it looks like MIC wasting $$$ on toys when there's unmet social and health needs that are desperately underfunded.
Even simple things like repackaging and ruggedising COTS hardware to pass shock/vibration standards, weatherproofing it for a range of adverse conditions, etc. is a reasonable cause to add "military grade" markup.