5 comments

[ 5.2 ms ] story [ 23.8 ms ] thread
This article is low quality. I was expecting a little more data to backup each “misconception” instead of hand waving.
Yes indeed, not the most detailed article out there. It displays some statistics which i was ignorant about that's why i posted it. Thanks for the comment @mdmglr.
written by a self-proclaimed 'productivity guru'.. jesus.
Medium post? - check! Misleading chart with no labels in the header? - check!

Nothing to see here folks.

I'll reply by the top voted comment of that article:

The author has no idea what is a programming language, why it exists and where it is used. To suppose that Java is equivalent to python only because a lot of programmers work on the most simple part of an application is totally wrong. It is as to suppose that a bycicle is better than a Caterpillar Miner only because there are more people that use the bycicle than people that drive a Miner. Ok.