Ask HN: Have you made a career move “down” on purpose, and how has it been?

54 points by throw_booored ↗ HN
I'm contemplating a career move down and an wondering, if others have gone through the same, what their experience has been.

Background: I work as a senior PM in a big tech company. The pay, without being out of line with the market, is more than I ever thought I'd make. I owned my house outright at age 40, I go out to eat whenever I feel like it, I get to travel a few times a year. I'm pretty happy about my life day to day.

But then I still think of my job as challenging and sometimes stressful. I look at some of my lower level engineering peers that are "stuck" in their careers (5+ years at the same level, no management responsibility), and honestly I feel like they have a pretty blissful life. Maybe I'm idealizing, but I feel like they can just think about how to build something, get it built, and move to the next thing. Not have to deal with recruitment, management, strategy, etc. Show up and fix the bugs.

I used to be a SWE and have kept my skills current, so I'm considering a move back and down from senior strategy and product work back to engineering IC work. This would likely cut my pay in half, so I'd have to do away with some luxuries, but I feel I could manage it financially.

Yet I also have a strong instinct against doing this, because it feels like self sabotage according to the standard definitions of a career. I worry about having regrets and endangering my family's financial safety.

Any folks who've gone through this and want to share their advice?

59 comments

[ 5.8 ms ] story [ 116 ms ] thread
You can do this, as long as you can commit to a score of 60 every time, below which you will be eliminated
(comment deleted)
Start living on the smaller salary now - see how it feels to cut the luxuries, squirrel away the rest into savings.

I’ve been to a colleague’s ‘demotion party’ from team lead to IC in another office - they had no regrets.

Be prepared for employers to be nervous about employing you - some will be worried about you being too big a flight risk because you might still have an open door to senior PM roles. So plan to manage that fear on their side.

> I also have a strong instinct against doing this, because it feels like self sabotage

With this framing, it can turn your life into a disaster.

Up to that point, I was nodding to every sentence you wrote. But not to this, no. When I demoted myself in my time, which ended very well, I had a different framing (or, a different gut feeling). My instinct was that I'm selling my well-being for much much too low a price and that, this time, there is a greener pasture.

I was noticing the money flow and how I was enabling a business owner, a very concrete physical person, to profit immensely. You can call it envy, I'd say I've learned that I can enter and leave any business transaction as I please.

The career path is just smoke and mirrors.

The ownership shenanigans is just smoke and mirrors. It doesn't matter that the ownership is split into million shares, because in the end of the chain the wealth (from many companies) does converge to an individual. Look through these schemes. As a thought experiment, think about that individual on a hard day, imagine how you've just made "him" 2 million with your sacrifice and you will get 20 grand bonus.

I'm not saying to go to the streets and loot the businesses, I'm saying you need to see your transaction and your options clearly, without distractions. Talk to your family in this framing as well.

The problem with this thinking is that an effective engineer in a profitable company is going to make someone alot of money.

If you want to capture that money for yourself you can, but it will be a very hard slog.

Making a lot of money for someone else is not the problem. The problem is confusion about some of the aspects of being-a-miserable-manager or being-an-effective-engineer. Not seeing clearly your entire cost/benefit and employer's entire cost/benefit.
If humans actually knew how to measure the value-added by any particular engineer or manager with high certainty then I'm pretty sure that tech corporations would be operated much differently.
(comment deleted)
> When I demoted myself in my time, which ended very well, I had a different framing (or, a different gut feeling). My instinct was that I'm selling my well-being for much much too low a price and that, this time, there is a greener pasture.

My thoughts exactly. Management or enterprise architecture seems so much more stressful and uncomfortable than coding that I would consider doing it for at least 70% raise (and probably would require closer over 100% to really pull the trigger). Whereas, in practice it pays maybe 30% more than coding and, in many companies here in Europe, actually less than coding (managers are perms with meager salaries, coders are contractors with fat daily rates).

Yes, I have. I've talked about it here [0] and here [1] . The difference being that it was a complete career change. Pay went down about $12K which was considerable for a family of 4. In the end it was worth it and I'd do it again.

If you are not happy then I think it is worth moving "down". Worrying about financial safety is important but what about your mental health?

My vote is to seriously consider the move and try to figure out a way to make it work moving "down".

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33126861

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30204355

(comment deleted)
I have done something similar recently. I was tech lead (and soon to be promoted to staff engineer) earning X and with tons of responsibility. I quit and got a job for a senior engineer position earning 25% more. Less responsibility. Now I will wait for 1 year or so to get salary raise, another year to get promoted to staff (with corresponding salary raise). Basically, I'm earning more doing less.
I've gone from management to individual contributor and back to management, mostly because I hated the culture where I was a manager and landed somewhere where its really good so its not a slog.

My advice would be to think of the reasons why you wanted to move up from SWE into various roles leading to the Senior PM role you have now. Were you interested in those roles to be someone in the room making decisions, thinking you would do a better job than others? Maybe you were attracted to the strategy aspects? Maybe it was coaching people and see them grow? Maybe it was 100% pure cash grab?

Blissfully building something and moving to the next thing is idealizing a software engineer's day to day. There is tech debt and the struggle of trying to convince people in your current role the importance, legacy code, legacy frameworks/methodologies, constantly having to learn the new shiny thing to stay relevant, dealing with many different engineer personalities, constantly being asked to deliver stuff in what is perceived as limited timeline, etc.

I was a communications executive and had been for more than a decade. But I always had a passion for engineering and built many side projects. I decided to pursue that passion and became an entry-level engineer. I was fortunate to have my company’s (and my wife’s) support. I went from managing a team of about 20 to being part of a small R&D team of about 6. It was the right change for where I’m at in life now despite a substantial cut in compensation.
I've been moving from working 100% to 80% to 60% while still making enough money to provide for a family and to squirrel away a decent portion of my salary.

I could have continued working at 100%... but what for? I realized I don't need status symbols like expensive clothes or a sports car with vanity plates, and my kids will get their smartphones second-hand, just as I do. We're now living in the countryside with decently sized garden and some animals around the house.

I've escaped the treadmill and it was the best decision of my life.

The grass is always greener, etc.

It might be better to spend some free time cultivating a side project or two where you can exercise your dev skills without endangering your income. Who knows, it might take off and turn into your own company down the road.

Once you give up salary and seniority, though, those are gone with the odds stacked against getting them back.

And there is the cynical (but non-zero) chance that many people will assume you were demoted for poor performance / behavioral issues / insert your own negative perception, instead of a voluntary move.

Tread cautiously, I'd say, don't do aything to endanger your current position and income.

I did, and it was shortsighted for my retirement savings and investments. While I was able to adjust, my lifestyle and expense is downward, you really just can’t scale down 401(k) contributions.

My advice: don’t do it. Look around while you have a job, but stay fully committed to your duties at work (stealing from your employers is still stealing and is wrong).

If you need to, take some vto to clear your mind and relax.

I did, and I hated it. As it turns out, what I really loved about the "higher" level was the scope and impact of my work, and the more strategic view of things. In my case, moving "down" also meant a huge (like 200-300%) increase in pay. I lasted 3 years in the higher-paying, yet "lower" role. I recently moved back to a "higher" role and am substantially happier.
Made a pretty big "down" move myself, except in my case I ended up changing careers.

1. I think the biggest challenge in making these decisions is the fear of making the "wrong" move and the fear of "regret". The reality is that there is no one right answer - regardless of what path you take, regret is baked in and guaranteed. The alternate path/s and its possibilities will always go unexplored/unknown. The question is which one are you ok with the consequences, both upside and downside. Which one are you going to regret more in terms of not taking action?

2. You are onto something in terms of money. We forget but it's only one form of exchange albeit one that we easily understand and that's why it dominates our thinking. But there are others not so obvious ones like time, energy, and identity which are of a higher order but don't get as much airtime. Obviously, you can't make decisions in a vacuum given others are dependent on you.

I've written about my experience that might help.

A collection of frameworks to think it through: https://www.leadingsapiens.com/essential-career-change-frame...

Some questions and the framework around money: https://www.leadingsapiens.com/questions-midlife-career-chan...

More questions around mid career dynamics: https://www.leadingsapiens.com/mid-career-mistakes/

If you already own your own house outright and are not faced with financial pressure in that department, a relatively minor step back in salary to maximize your mental-health and life enjoyment seems perfectly reasonable and logical. It's not like a software engineer (who already owns their own home by the way) is going to end up begging in the streets.

Just be advised that a software engineer's job isn't stress free either. Big projects can wreck you both mentally and physically. In some ways, being a PM is a lot easier.

As someone who never prioritized money but instead gravitated to mission and a career supporting my family life, my biggest recommendation is to keep earning the high salary as long as you can. Money represents options and time in a storable, transportable form — I didn’t realize that when I was younger and just figured I could live within my means. I make more than 5x my parents did in my rural town, but in an urban city it’s a different calculus for a family and I wish I built up enough money to exercise different options in life.

Further, as you get older, becoming an IC has ageism risks, and returning to age appropriate leadership roles maybe hard with the “drop” on your resume.

> age appropriate leadership roles

This fallacy is so common, but so obviously illogical. By definition, "leadership" roles require a larger number of "followers". Corporate structures are inevitably pyramid shaped, with a tiny number of executives at the top and then more middle managers below and still more ICs at the base.

But unless you're in a country with exponential population growth happening, that structure clearly doesn't represent the populace. There are going to be way more older workers than there are spots at the top of the pyramid.

As a society, we really need to embrace reality and stop pretending like the 5% of people in the upper ranks succeeded and the other 95% of people failed, if they don't rise to the top and then stay there for the rest of their career.

I don’t make the rules, I just know that when people are older it’s more acceptable to be in management or leadership.

One other thing in tech, I feel like there is a feeling that if you don’t have FU money by 40, and are still working in the coding weeds, you actually aren’t any good and are vulnerable when layoffs etc come around.

(comment deleted)
I did this for a career change, and it was worth it, but the adjustment period was extremely long (4-6x).

Financially it was okay (still painful; 20% cut + move to vhcol area), but I underestimated how much it would grate to _not matter_. I had grown accustomed to a certain level of deference and respect that was not available in the new role, and in fact my willingness to move "down" was viewed with some suspicion.

People will (almost) always assume you "couldn't cut it" in the old role (or had a mental health crisis or something), and higher-ranked people in the new job will rightly look at you as a potential threat from below.

Good luck. Moving back to IC can be good for some people, but I agree with the other poster that "self sabotage" is a phrase that suggests this may not be right for you.

> I worry about having regrets and endangering my family's financial safety.

The tipping point— when you no longer worry about things like finances, career track, opinions of others.

Either because you resolved those issues in your mind, or uncontrollable events have made your corporate position redundant.

Always a smart play to have a solid “Plan B” at the ready.

Product management isn't an upgrade from software engineering. You thought it was until you experienced it yourself. That was your downgrade. I went through that experience and realized PM is a necessary yet insufficient role for someone who has built, and enjoys building software. However, not all software is valued the same. Greenfield work is so much fun, creating something from first principles and intuition, blazing trails and risking failure to acquire insights. Why not dedicate yourself to innovative greenfield project work and keep the PM gig until your project can become a viable product?
(comment deleted)
Project Management looks to me the most stressful job there is. Specially in the consulting business working eith multiple customers. If I were in this position I would take a paycut and get back to software engineering.
I agree with all the cautionary advice already offered.

Here's my Yes, And...

> ...a move back and down from senior strategy and product work back to engineering IC work

The single best political advice I've ever gotten:

"Make them ask you three times."

(aka Play hard to get, Make them think it's their idea.)

Assuming you intend to stay with the same employer...

If there's an IC role that you desire, do all the things to reposition yourself for that role. So that it's obvious to everyone you're the best person.

When your Boss (or higher) says, "Hey @throw_booored, what do you think of this exciting opportunity building the next generation Acme Wonder Widget?"

"Hmmm, gee Boss, that sure does look cool. I'd love to work on that! Alas, I really love my job. I'm doing important work, with great people, having an impact. And we're so busy hitting some important deadlines. I couldn't possibly abandon them at a time like this. I'm sure you'll find someone..."

Back and forth. Never dismiss the offer. Just demure. Always sound enthusiastic about the idea, grateful for the consideration, and oh so regretful you couldn't possibly take that role at this time.

Around the third time, you say something like "Wow. You've really planted a seed. I can't stop thinking about this. I'd like to say yes. What would a transition look like? Compensation? Responsibilities?" Etc, etc.

I'm curious - what's the benefit in this example over accepting it on the first interaction, if that's what you desire?
Sure. So long as everyone understands you're doing the Boss a solid.
I was a backend software engineer and I became a teacher 10 years ago. Don't know if that counts as a down though :-) I am very happy and there is no stress in my life anymore.
My neighboor did this too and I can see myself following the same path later in life, this seems like a nice thing to do. Salary would probably take a dip (depends on where I'd teach), and I'd have to calculate first if I can afford it with mortgage and stuff.
Never "down" from last job, but interviewed with 3 companies, got 3 offers, and after a lot of thought, picked the worst salary out of 3, still it was a little better than what I was doing before. Chose shorter commute, and many small things that I preferred, more "humane" management, etc.

I was on parental leave when interviewing, and of course me becoming a dad made me pick this one over the other ones where I'd prolly have stressed a lot, worked extra for bonuses that don't exist where I ended up, etc.

I don't regret it, except when it's time to negociate a raise and I think about the amount I could be earning. Doesn't last long, I can still switch later if I really need the money, I'm still receiving very positive mails from those I declined, they're actively looking for new hires even recently.

I quit a $2m job to dick around with board games
I don't and will never have a family so it changes the calculus significantly, but I walked away from a political communications job to be a bra fitter/do IT for a small business. How I feel about it changes on a daily basis: The financial stress sucks but at the same time it's so nice to leave work at work and to have mental energy to work on my own projects/hobbies/have a life of my own again. It's not viable long term, but a job that I can roll in and give 20 percent at means I could work on my mental and physical health instead of work eating my life.