60 comments

[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 123 ms ] thread
Why would work not be getting done? It's just a weed stereotype. Some people are inspired or more productive after smoking.
It's true. They should be piping the smoke into classrooms.
It's not good for teens or people before 25. Again you're trying to be silly when a serious discussion is what is required.
Have smoked for several decades. If you think weed does not affect productivity, then you haven’t smoked enough of it.

If something can have a positive effect it can also have a negative effect. The idea that weed is a net positive with no downsides just isn’t reality.

Most people have jobs where most of their cognitive capacity matters not one whit. You can stock shelves or do office work while stoned out of your mind (and people do). For some reason we don't love the idea, but tbqh these jobs are broadly torture anyway - so why are people not allowed to make them bearable?
For all we know people are being smart and smoking high cbd strains in the morning.
I've seen you comment so many times and I honestly can't tell if you're serious or a parody account
When I use cannabis I just end up coding or working on my homelab for hours straight, I think it's wonderful for my productivity
My experience with THC is that it has a pronounced Ballmer Peak (see xkcd), with a higher high (heh) and lower low than alcohol.

At just the right level and with the right environment (and jazz fusion album) it's a shortcut to flow state and serendipitous lateral thinking, but overshoot that and you'll just be forgetting what local variables are in scope..

Well, you said it. Some people.

I was a stoner for all my 20s. A toke and the hardest thing I could do was play video games and eat junk food. Meanwhile, my stoner mates would work on their side projects until deep into the night.

We're not all cut from the same cloth.

Yeah but those outcomes would be similar even if you didn't smoke.

Everyone has different levels of intrinsic motivation.

What's the havoc exactly? From all the people interviewed, the ones complaining about the smoke on their way to the office seem to be losing most productivity...
Yes...
So people are mad because they lose productivity because they are too busy complaining about weed? Brilliant
That's certainly one story, but the more plausible one is that people who are more productive --and have more productivity to lose-- are less likely to smoke marijuana. Equivalently, marijuana smokers are generally less productive.
I don't know about that, I did multiple degrees and I'm working on a PhD and I smoke and use edibles all the time. I know other people who are similar.

Almost like cannabis use is independent of productivity and the lazy stoner stereotype is a drug war myth, weird huh

These are basic statistical errors you're making, which likely means either:

1. You've been enrolling in programs with a low barrier to entry

2. You've smoked away whatever you did learn.

I didn't realize neuroscience and pharmacology are low barrier to entry oh boy
I'm glad we can both agree that you've smoked yourself stupid.
So if I smoked myself stupid again, why am I a PhD candidate studying neuropsychopharmacology? You must be a special kind of brilliant

I'm glad we have computer experts like you on the internet sharing your expertise on neuropharmacology

Lol, relax. I think there's a thc gummi bear somewhere with your name on it.
I love how you blatantly break site guidelines by insulting people then jokingly tell them to relax when they get annoyed with the asinine comments
AITA For wanting to be able to walk in peace without inhaling smoke? Weed gives me extreme paranoid reactions even from small doses. Being forced to breathe it feels like an assault and I have anxiety until it wears off. As a society we have rationalized the use of smoking by saying that there are absolutely no downsides, it has no addictive properties, and is safe and useful to anyone (unlike all other known substances). However some people are infirm, elderly, children with developing brains and lungs, have health problems, have anxiety issues that weed exacerbates, et cetera. Ive known more than One person who is pushed to a psychotic break by heavy weed use. Maybe it's anecdotal, but there are mentally unstable people, and exposing them to highly concentrated thc of today seems cruel (possibly condemning them to a hellish life).

I feel this mindset of spraying substances everyone must endure is a bit like a factory polluting the river, an externality the selfish justify because it benefits them and doesnt have personal cost. But rest assured, others are bearing the cost.

If you think that everyone else should be subjected to your psychoative smoke, then you should have no problem with people disposing of half used medication into the office water cooler. After all it was prescribed by a doctor and is probably safe in small doses. There are no studies showing any negative effects of half a prozac dissolved in a water cooler, so there are probably no negative effects. If everyone disposed of their half used medications into unfiltered drinking water, we can be sure it would cause no problems since my experience of that medication has caused me no problems.

Second hand weed smoke does not lead to any meaningful increase in THC plasma concentration
> Second hand weed smoke does not lead to any meaningful increase in THC plasma concentration

Every high school stoner that's hot boxed a car before class with friends knows firsthand that's not an accurate statement.

But smelled in passing outdoors, sure.

As a former hotboxing teenager I would argue that hot boxing a car doesn't do anything to increase THC plasma concentration, but it is a great way to restrict oxygen
As someone who for much of his youth socialized with pot smokers without being one himself, I've had enough "contact highs" just from sharing enclosed spaces with these people to know the second-hand effects are present (though weak).
If hot boxing a car over an hour consumes enough oxygen to matter it wouldn't be possible to sleep in a car without running out of oxygen. A couple blunts doesn't consume that much.
Restrict != run out
My point is that the oxygen consumed over the duration of hotboxing a car is so trivial compared to spending hours sleeping in a car that if the former has any effect the latter should too.
What makes you think that it doesn't?
Automobile passenger compartments are vented, otherwise there'd be problematic pressure spikes on door/hatch closures. You're not getting deprived of oxygen sleeping in a vehicle.
What is the rate of air exchange in a closed passenger compartment of a vehicle that is not running?

Likewise, what is the rate of CO2 production from an average sedentary human?

On top of that, what is the rate of combustion byproduct production from burning plant matter in a closed passenger compartment?

An increase from 0 to a tiny and insignificant amount is an increase of infinity percent.
But it isn't pharmacogically relevant
For some people -- some people will die if peanut dust gets in their mouth. We decided to use warnings and labels for this small subgroup.
Sorry but THC is not an allergen, it doesn't work like that. People aren't magically thousands of times more sensitive to a neurotransmitter than others. Yea there is some variation but not like that
I like to believe molecules dont dissappear at random so I assume one passing breath of the high concentration strains has an effect on people who are not tolerant, but maybe something magical happens so those particular thc molecules have no effect.
Similar to "these pesticides are dumped far from people and definitely are not harmful." Until I see population studies I believe molecules entering the body have effects and in complex systems those effects are unpedictable. You claim there is no effect of adding these new molecules into a population of ~10M, a strong claim that would be the first time "psycoactive substance I use for the mood altering affect has no affect on others."
I didn't realize THC was a new molecule
You're drawing a lot of parallels and making a lot of equivalences, as well as bold large claims. It appears to have not even a shred of evidence, except for the fact that you appear to have a strong placebo response to secondhand smoke. It sucks for you, truly. I do not believe that everyone should stop doing a thing that bothers mostly just you just because you don't like it. It's not a reasonable expectation.
It is not “mostly just [them]”. Many, many people - most people, maybe - would rather the world not smell like weed.
And I would rather the world not smell like car exhaust, which is definitely far more harmful
Nope, you're a reasonable and rational person and just like cig smoke, its rude to smoke pot in public/on the street
Not only this, but pot smokers stink from a great distance. When driving I can often tell when a person who regularly smokes is in the car ahead of me.

Once I went to a small comedy club with very close seating. A young kid came in and just stunk to high hell, made it really hard to enjoy the show.

No you cannot smell a person through your car and through their car. What?
I often drive by a home, in a state with legal weed, and I can smell the stench from the road ... every single time too, and no, they aren't smoking outside at all times of day. I'm not anti weed, and I wouldn't complain about someone smoking on their own privacy, or even when alone/not around others, but you can indeed smell it from afar. And if you smoke, you know.
My guess is that they are growing pot, not just smoking it. These days you can smell the industrial marijuana warehouses from the freeway in Oakland, inside a car with the windows up.
That is nonsense. I could roll around in shit and drive and you wouldn’t be able to smell me from a car behind me, that’s crazy.
I'm not making this up. And I'm not alone in this (I'll ask a passenger if they too can smell it and they'll often say they can).

I might have a more sensitive nose than most.

Regular pot smokers absolutely stink.

As to your comment about shit, agreed I likely couldn't smell it from a car distance with windows up. Which tells you how much stronger pot smell actually is since I actually can smell that.

Nah, I can confirm I've smelled heavy pot smokers through my car. Happens at least once a week.

I think it's specifically blunt smokers, but I have no data to support that.

I feel like these people can't tell the difference between driving past a skunk and cannabis
If you can smell weed coming from the car ahead of you, it's probably because they are smoking weed in the car.
While I'm not a fan of constant exposure to the smell of Cannabis at home from people growing it without proper odor control in my neighborhood and people smoking it everywhere, it's highly unlikely that your anxiety is from secondhand exposure to cannabis smoke.

There are several good studies about second hand exposure, like https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25326203/ (and related listed) though not without limitations and not fulfilling all science best practices that come to the same conclusion:

You basically need to be exposed to secondhand smoke in an unventilated room for hours to inhale enough active ingredients to have minor behavioral and cognitive effects from second hand exposure.

Without giving you medical advice, I'd probably consider talking to a psychiatrist if you obviously have considerable discomfort from the smell of cannabis. As someone with PTSD who sometimes got flashbacks and anxiety from smells like charred meat, maybe there is an (un)conscious event in your past or youth that you connect with the smell of cannabis that makes you this uncomfortable.

It's worth checking out, it got significantly better for me from therapy and "unlearning" that connection.

Amen; I agree.

I absolutely don't mind weed, or even cigarettes, but it sucks to be assaulted by the smell all of the time.

Not much that can be done about that aside from making smoking at all illegal and heavily prosecuting people that do it, and even then the people with no fucks to give will still smoke up.

Interesting, Washington (state) has had legal weed for nearly a decade now and does not appear to have experienced societal collapse or an incoherently high workforce. Maybe the east coast has a power THC tolerance?
As far as smells go- maybe urban density exacerbates the issue that WA is able to avoid.
Imagine if people didn't want to return to the office because they were getting drunk first thing in the morning. I doubt we'd consider that acceptable.
Yeah, I'm extremely liberal but I wish we'd ban all public smoking/vaping of everything (i.e. you get a ticket). I really dislike the smell of weed, and here in the EU it feels like every time my pregnant partner and I are at a bus stop someone's blowing (tobacco) smoke directly in our faces.