[–] quantumfoolery 3y ago ↗ In my expert opinion, you may (or may not) be able to trust it. [–] efitz 3y ago ↗ Or both, at the same time. [–] edgyquant 3y ago ↗ Common misconception. It’s actually a probability distribution of trust: not actually trustful and trustless at the same time. [–] User23 3y ago ↗ That depends on which interpretation you subscribe to. [–] [deleted] 3y ago ↗ (comment deleted) [–] geoelectric 3y ago ↗ I'm not even sure I can trust the quantum simulator I'm living in, never mind a second-order one.
[–] efitz 3y ago ↗ Or both, at the same time. [–] edgyquant 3y ago ↗ Common misconception. It’s actually a probability distribution of trust: not actually trustful and trustless at the same time. [–] User23 3y ago ↗ That depends on which interpretation you subscribe to. [–] [deleted] 3y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
[–] edgyquant 3y ago ↗ Common misconception. It’s actually a probability distribution of trust: not actually trustful and trustless at the same time. [–] User23 3y ago ↗ That depends on which interpretation you subscribe to. [–] [deleted] 3y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
[–] User23 3y ago ↗ That depends on which interpretation you subscribe to. [–] [deleted] 3y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
[–] geoelectric 3y ago ↗ I'm not even sure I can trust the quantum simulator I'm living in, never mind a second-order one.
[–] impetus21 3y ago ↗ Anyone want to do the QC challenge? [–] thenightcrawler 3y ago ↗ what is that?
10 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 32.0 ms ] thread