Great topic, but I'm disappointed by the Wikipedia article. It strikes me as a bit hagiographic. I could be wrong. Can anyone suggest anything more critical on this topic (in any sense of "critical")?
By the way, I'm not the person who submitted this link and I don't know why they submitted it.
1 comment
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 14.3 ms ] threadBy the way, I'm not the person who submitted this link and I don't know why they submitted it.