Neil deGrasse: Books every intelligent person should read (openculture.com) 13 points by erikj54 14y ago ↗ HN
[–] forensic 14y ago ↗ Thats a sad list. Provocative, political, vapid, with empty moralizing tacked for the sake of symmetry not substance.Another depressing display of the intellectual poverty of pop science.
[–] cageface 14y ago ↗ Was this list compiled 100 years ago? Surely there must now be better introductions to evolution, philosophy, economics, politics, physics etc. than these original texts. [–] bunderbunder 14y ago ↗ Well, it's a list of free e-books. 100 years is approximately how long it takes for a work of literature to fall into the public domain.
[–] bunderbunder 14y ago ↗ Well, it's a list of free e-books. 100 years is approximately how long it takes for a work of literature to fall into the public domain.
[–] zeroonetwothree 14y ago ↗ I've read only 1 of those (out of 500+ books I've read). Oh well, I guess I'm not intelligent. [–] tzs 14y ago ↗ It's a list of books you should read, not a list of books you should have already read, so you've still got time to qualify. :-)
[–] tzs 14y ago ↗ It's a list of books you should read, not a list of books you should have already read, so you've still got time to qualify. :-)
5 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 25.1 ms ] threadAnother depressing display of the intellectual poverty of pop science.