Ask HN: How to ensure your water is safe to drink?

35 points by drio ↗ HN
I am trying to decide if using a water filter for the whole house would bring any benefits. Particularly health benefits.

I think is all about testing your water to make sure it is safe to drink. From what I have seen the area where I live (US, SC) is tested periodically to ensure it is safe to drink.

There is also the lead component. I do not have any lead pipes but I am thinking about getting a water test from a lab anyway.

Are you doing anything to ensure your water is safe to drink? What are you thoughts?

Thank you.

41 comments

[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 101 ms ] thread
you've hit upon a thorny problem. water testing services only test for obvious things like heavy metals, leaving organic contamination (i.e. drugs, industrial chemicals, etc) pretty much untouched. There are rather disturbing maps of American obesity levels that correlate well with river drainage basins. Reverse osmosis filtering is the answer, but you'll need to supplement to replace lost minerals like calcium, etc.
Yep. Atrazine.
correlation =/= causation.

But it does hint toward a potential linkage, which is our food system.

The areas you are thinking about are also: food deserts, low-income, and low education levels. All of which are stronger predictors of obesity.

Three stage whole house filters are about $500, sediment->heavy metals->carbon (with the ability to swap the post sediment filters for other cartridges targeting your water challenges). Throw in a UV filter for pathogens if cost is no object, and you might be able to avoid RO. Have to test the water to be sure what you should be filtering for. A quality lab water test runs $200-$300.
I think this is mostly just correlation, and the more direct tie is in the economic demographic. River drainage basins generally go like this - the affluent demographic live on the upstream side of the city, the poor demographic live on the downstream side that's dirty and polluted after passing through the municipal area
I've considered the "lost minerals" angle, and from my research, I don't think it's an issue at all. The main significant minerals in tap water are Calcium, Magnesium, and Sodium.

"For half of the tap water sources we examined, adults may fulfill between 8% and 16% of their Ca2+ DRI and between 6% and 31% of their Mg2+ DRI by drinking 2 liters per day." from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1495189/

And another paper on calcium: "On an average basis this would represent 5% to 10% of the usual daily intake or approximately 6.5% of the adult RDA." from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK216589/

The calcium seems negligible. Magnesium is a top nutrient deficiency in Western diets, so could be somewhat negative, but because of that I (and probably you) should be supplementing magnesium anyway. Sodium is obviously found abundantly in western diets.

So based on that, I don't think re-mineralizing's tiny benefits are worth the potential risk of re-adding negative contaminants somehow.

If you happen to live in the Upstate then you have little to worry about. It's some of the best in the nation. Not sure about the Midlands and coast.

What would you test for besides lead? Most contaminants have a very low threshold which is going to be expensive to detect.

> What would you test for besides lead?

Arsenic, Uranium, Hexavalent Chromium, to name a few of my local municipality's measured water contaminants of concern...

At a minimum your local municipality should be running tests periodically and sending you the results in a newsletter of some sort.

If they are not running sufficiently thorough tests for your liking, you can get your own testing done and go from there.

If you live in an older house or neighborhood, you should absolutely test your water for lead. Even if you house is new, there could be a gooseneck to the city main that is lead. Some cities even offer heavy metal testing for free.

Other than for taste or hardness, I never felt particularly like filtering water. I don't think I can outsmart the dozen PHDs that run our municipal water system and don't want the hassle or waste of dealing with filters.

Also, obsessively filtering water can come with it's own health concerns. You can filter out the treatments added to water that prevent toxic algae from growing. And natural impurities in our water are actually a very underrated and important source of minerals.

Additionally, not all homes have back flow preventers. Yes, in theory they should - but the reality is that there's a reasonable chance that your street has at least one home without one. If they have lead pipes, then there could be at least some levels of lead in your water too.
It's probably a good idea to use an RO filter regardless. It's a very straightforward way to reduce toxins directly entering your body. Virtually everything is now contaminated with environmental toxins, and we're effectively being bombarded. You can't avoid them but you can take steps to minimize your exposure/reduce your risk

This is a good database of water quality: https://www.ewg.org/tapwater/

Filters introduce additional risk because they themselves can become dirty (or even contaminated). Looking inside a well-used water filter can be a horrifying experience.

Personally, I filter all water because I’m an obsessive but I’ve come to realise that I’m probably increasing the likelihood of exposure to something not-good — because now I have complete responsibility for maintaining and cleaning my filtering, no big government machine keeping my water clean, just me and my human negligence.

There are never ending risks to everything we do, be mindful you don’t get caught up in trying to make everything perfectly safe — especially if you have children, the paranoia and worry is more transmissible than whatever is in your water.

> Personally, I filter all water because I’m an obsessive but I’ve come to realise that I’m probably increasing the likelihood of exposure to something not-good — because now I have complete responsibility for maintaining and cleaning my filtering, no big government machine keeping my water clean, just me and my human negligence.

A belt and suspenders approach alleviates this a bit, have the input into your system be processed municipal water.

The issue is if the filter itself introduces problems, or something after the filter(Like a tank of unchlorinated water growing something toxic).
Where I live I get my water from a well, actually - and the regional public health office provides sample bottles for testing. They ship them off to a larger city's health unit for testing, and it takes weeks, but services exist, and they may in your area too.
Buying a simple Brita filter is probably a good idea, right?
The EWG has a tap water database [0] that I used to get a rough estimate of my tap water quality. Since it was above their recommended levels in several chlorine-containing chemicals and a few radioactive elements, I decided to get an under-sink Aquasana water filter (I’d have gotten while home if I didn’t rent). The one I got is certified for pretty much every known harmful substance, at the highest certified level, as far as I am aware. I haven’t gone full mistrust and tested my water after the fact to ensure it works as advertised, but the water tastes noticeably different and I have personally noticed changes in my energy levels since adding the filter. There are too many unhealthy compounds that are not monitored for, or are under-monitored for, to justify skipping out on water filtration IMO.

[0]: https://www.ewg.org/tapwater/

More water quality data from the same service that mytapscore is using — https://gosimplelab.com/citywater

Just enter your city/town name. Click data, and choose whether youre looking at Public Water or Point of use data.

With regard to lead, I recently found out that most faucets manufactured before 2014 have lead in them. I found this out while replacing parts for a faucet in a house built before 2013.

https://www.mwra.com/04water/html/Lead_Faucets.htm

tl;dr: if you think your faucets are older than 2014, run the cold water for a bit before filling a glass for drinking.

(comment deleted)
Before you decide to do any filter/treatment it is a good idea to get a lab test.

Testing water can get a little complicated and expensive. Ideally you’d test at the water source (where it enters your home) and at the point of use (where you pour it into your cup to drink it). This way you know the quality of the source water and the quality of the water after it flows through your pipes.

Testing this way can get expensive though. Also, ideally you’d test about once a year to see if there are changes.

Once you get the test results you’ll know what specifically you need to do to treat the water. You may not need anything.

I would suggest using Tapscore for the testing. I’ve used them in the past. https://mytapscore.com/

One final bit of advice, if you do want to get something like a reverse osmosis filter, go to a company that makes RO filters and send them your test results. I learned the hard way that there was too much radon in my water to work with the very expensive RO filter that I bought.

Be careful about going overboard with a whole house filter. Your municipal water has a residual disinfectant (chlorine or chloramine), and, if your utility is at all competent, they’ve adjusted the pH and other chemical parameters to prevent the water from being corrosive to copper, brass, and lead.

If you filter the water where it enters your house, you may change the chemistry, and you are quite likely to dechlorinate and possibly dechloraminate your water. So now water that stagnates in your pipes can start growing things, hot water in your water heater might be more likely to grow legionella, and your pipes and fittings might be more likely to leach metals.

You could consider an under-sink filter. They’re quite inexpensive and fairly easy to install. And you don’t use up their capacity for things like flushing the toilet.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/sep/15/america-wate...

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/mar/31/americas-tap...

https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2022-04-08/...

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/04/16/flint-water-cri...

Extended family members died from drinking uranium-contaminated water around Durango. They all lived in the same house and died of unusual cancers within about a decade of each other. They didn't find out about it until it was too late.

Not sure what this has to do with my comment.

Interestingly, soluble forms of uranium are anionic, so cation exchange resins (which remove lead, for example) don’t remove it. Apparently one can use an anion exchange resin or (I assume) a reverse osmosis filter.

i would not rely on any government testing, especially as they would not test the last part of piping anyways. it is not cheap (i pay 60 to 200 euros depending on lab and amount of tests) but i found two of my flats had non drinkable water with lead and bacteria levels multiples of the max allowance. i could never understand why there is no rule that every building has to have an official water test at least once like the energy ratings.
I've moved neighbourhoods, counties, cities, states, countries and continents. I've learned that a public utility is to never be trusted nor a private utility. I start with using a tap filter, something like the Brita series. Then I add a shower filter. Those two are the first initial setups I have in regards to water at home. From there I'll take note under a specified time frame if there are any pros and cons. Context would change for you.
what does a shower filter do? is it expensive or noticeably different, reduce flow?
It filters your shower water depending on the type you get, in my case it's a simple chlorine filter from Brita. All the ones you see online are largely the same type with different branding. It's not to expensive, personally I value my health and I've lived in shitty conditions with really bad water. Water flow can change depending on the outlet type you get, similar to a hose. Reduction of flow doesn't really happen unless you get those white-label transparent with colorful rocks type filter attachment, I've heard bad reviews of those.
Just get an under-sink reverse osmosis system in your kitchen, and have it piped to your ice maker if you have one. Better to have excellent filtration of the water you actually use rather than mediocre or expensive filtration of house water, much of which is going to go to bathing/cleaning etc.
Berkey filter with charcoal elements. Supposedly it can remove bacteria (but not viruses). All I know for sure is that it makes the water taste a lot better.

I've had the same filter elements in mine for years. Recently I needed a glass of water for my night stand and the filter was empty. It's slow to fill so I just filled the glass from the tap. I thought the chlorine would evaporate overnight. Well maybe it did, but one way or another the water still tasted gross the next morning. So the filters are still doing something. And that's after 5 years.

Huh. They claim they’re tested by a lab that does NSF testing, but they don’t appear here:

https://info.nsf.org/Certified/DWTU/

Also, its’s expensive.

I consider this to be a baseline:

https://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/p/d/v000517548/

It’s genuinely NSF listed, varies from about $40 to about $60, and has pretty good throughput.

For anything fancier, I would either get an RO system with a permeate pump (and I would absolutely do this if I lived somewhere with annoyingly hard water) or a commercial system. Check webstaurantstore.com or similar.

If you have a dramatic taste improvement with filtration, you probably have chlorinated water. IMO it tastes nasty, is easy to remove, and is harmless to drink at normal concentrations if the chemistry is right. Lobby your utility to switch to chloramine for residual disinfection.

(If you spend time around pools, you might be familiar with these compounds in a swimming pool context. Chlorine has a mild clean smell, and many people don’t love it in their drinking water. Chlorine plus many organic things turns into monochloramine, dichloramine, and nitrogen trichloride. These are collectively called “combined chlorine”. The latter two are utterly disgusting and possibly quite harmful, and the nasty “chlorine” smell in less well maintained pools, especially indoors, is those. Pure monochloramine is inoffensive in reasonable concentrations.)

You can only test at a point in time. So you want to test periodically. Since it sounds like you are on municipal water, 12 months should be ok, 6 months if you're feeling paranoid. I'm on well water and test frequently.

Home testing kits are cheap. Sending it out to the lab is pricey but you get more detail and consistent results. For lead, home testing is fine. You should do at least one mail lab test to start with. Unless your house is ancient, almost certainly you won't find lead. Your water company should be using "clean" sources to ensure no lithium, magnesium and such.

Depends on the area.

- Whole house filter consisting of specific commodity 20" large ("big blue") filters

- (NaCl) ion exchange water softener sized for the hardness -> hot and cold water to most indoor piping except kitchen cold water (for watering plants) and outside

- 6 stage + UV 100 GPD RO filtration system using commodity parts. Add a permeate pump option to transfer pressure and reduce waste. There is no real cost difference in production flow rate between 5 GPD and 100 GPD except losses, minor membrane differences, and the restrictor valve. 200 GPD is tankless, so that's a minus.

A US So Cal manufacturer, AMI / wateranywhere.com can ship large orders by freight for 1/3 the price a plumber will charge for a crappy wholesale system. They make RO membranes and industrial-scale desalination systems, so b2b and b2c are side markets for them.

Clean out everything and run antimicrobials at least every 4 months.

It's work, but having nice showers and clean water down to <1 ppm is awesome.

PS: For apartment dwellers in large cities, find a reputable "water store" that has both a commercial AND retail business from the same equipment. Buy your own non-PFOS containers from the REI or some such. Sunray Waters in ATX is one example.

The only reason I would consider a whole house filter is if I wanted to run the whole house off well water. That's not really just a simple filter though, at that point you're processing the input such that it won't ruin appliances, etc.
I have an RO, only because I have a water softener, otherwise I wouldn't bother, and didn't anywhere else I lived. I trust the engineers and scientists at the water company more than some shady filter dropshippers.

If you -really- care, you could always distill your own water. It's pretty cheap and easy to do so.

Maybe someone with more knowledge in this area can provide enlightment, but I always heard that eating plenty of fibre, such as wholemeal bread or greens like cabbages, broccoli, kale etc, could absorb toxins and carry them out of your body. In which case this could compensate to some extent if your tap water is contaminated. Of course, high fibre may also carry away the good stuff like vitamins too. Just wondered if increasing fibre intake is a realistic way of protecting yourself. Seems to me some of the tap water contamination a filter may not do much for. And... do you trust bottle water really? where has that come from? Here in the UK we don't even test for PFAS AFAIK, which is scary.
I smell it, look at it and taste it. If it passes these tests I drink it and wait to see it I react in any way. If I don't I declare it safe and tell the rest of the family. If it smells funny I go and have a look at the well to see if there's anything strange there, I one caught a whole family of frogs in it.

Yes, we have our own well, about 5.5 m deep and 1.20 wide, lined with concrete rings. It is dug through a non-permeable layer at the foot of a hill which makes the water level in it higher than ground level, making it nearly impossible for surface water to make its way into our supply. When the thaw comes the water gets a bit cloudy from silt (which is what lies between us and bedrock, a layer of a few metres here and there as memory of the last glaciation). I pumped it out once to do some repairs, put a layer of gravel on the bottom and put in a new back valve, for the rest it has worked fail-free in the more than 20 years that we live here. I did have the water analysed after the repairs, it was fine. So are we. So will you be, without any silly filtration systems unless your municipality really messes up their water supply.

I'm on a rain water tank so would also appreciate some advice there for DIY style where you don't have access to municipal water..