7 comments

[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 8.6 ms ] thread
Oh damn no! It's scary how ignorant the LLM really are.. But it's surprisingly scary how ignorant people using them are..
I love the inclusion of the last piece of advice from ChatGPT. Lol.
I love how they avoid hypocrisy by not only asking what ChatGPT thinks about what the judge did, but also what ChatGPT thinks about what the journalist did.
It will be interesting and potentially a novel issue on appeal. I don't see how it would be successful if there are no errors in fact or law but always nice to see technology and law moving forward in lock-step
(comment deleted)
Sounds like a good way to get your ruling thrown out on appeal.
I expect that a double tier system will emerge where those who can afford it, will be serviced by humans and the rest by AI.

With the current quality of AI that is. In some distant future, the price structure may get reversed.