Best TLD that can't be taken down by US/etc?
This is purely hypothetical (I'm way too vanilla to actually have a use for this), but me and a friend were wondering... considering the US now lays claim to any .com domain as their own jurisdiction, and also considering how many domains are getting taken down lately for "arguable" offences, which TLD would you use to have a site that is "safe"?
Just say you wanted a blog where you could post anything you wanted, and host anything you wanted.
Assuming you don't care about the branding benefits of a major TLD.
42 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 92.2 ms ] threadThe answer is simple, such an action would require a formal court order from an Icelandic court. ISNIC has never been handed such a verdict about any .is-domain during its close to 25 years of history."
http://www.isnic.is/en/news/view?id=204
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_to_live#DNS_records
Iceland's servers have to host the records, so low TTLs would increase their traffic and therefore load.
And now, maybe today, ChuckN will read your comment, the first person to acknowledge him after so long, and he will playback the last 2 years of his HN involvement in a montage in his head as all of the pieces start to come together ... why does no one respond to my comments? why do my comments always get downvoted? could it be true? am I really... dead?
This is quite a remarkable story actually.
The only gotcha I would mention if you go through isnic is that you need to have your own DNS servers, and they have to be registered with ISNIC with a NIC handle (and some other things?). I just use Linode's DNS servers (where I host it), and haven't had any issues.
Please refrain from using '1337' speak here. s/sez/says/ and thank you.
If relevant to your domain's future content, optionally consult http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_parties_to_internationa... and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_parties_to_internationa...
Then register your domain(s) with an ethical registrar that does not do business in the U.S. and will only respond to court orders in their own country.
A possible option would be http://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/st.html through http://www.nic.st/ . The company (Bahnhof) has a vocal history of protecting it's clients against corporate depredations; see http://www.thelocal.se/18882/20090416/
https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-hidden-service.html.en
I like the idea of .ru or other TLDs under sclerotic court systems.
The fear with .ru would be that somebody could 'buy' your domain with corrupt influence.
I would say .ru for 'anything goes' or .ch for 'I know I am in the right and I think a truly independent court would defend me'
InternetNZ is an open membership charitable society that is the delegated country manager for .nz and has the objective to strive for an open and uncapturable internet.
They delegated the day to day management of .nz to www.dnc.org.nz, who also run the disputes service (http://dnc.org.nz/story/drs-home), while the register itself is delegated by InternetNZ to www.nzrs.net.nz. This structure was set up to ensure that these sorts of issues would be resolved appropriately.
I note that the new gTLDs (.whatever) will need to use ICANN's standard dispute resolution process, which is convoluted, lengthy and expensive. I do not know how these will fare under SOPA et al.
(I'm an elected Councillor of InternetNZ. http://internetnz.net.nz)
I'm very happy with my .nz domain, but it's lame that I have to have my home address in a publicly accessible database.
this looks easy enough: https://poboxes.usps.com/poboxonline/search/landingPage.do
I'd assume other countries provide something similar?
edit: The USPS will provide this info no questions asked, no subpoena or court order required.
Australia had to implement the ridiculous "70 year after death" rule, and so on.
I don't think a call from Washington DC to any country is enough to shut down domains, otherwise, what would the US need SOPA for?
.nz i could see catching on. there's got to be a much more 'friendly' TLD though. nz doesn't feel as generic as com/biz/net/org
who controls .mobi?
You might note that .ch/.li is used by a number of controversial sites at the moment such as:
See this article about pressure from the US and French governments on .ch (Switch) to censor WL, which they refused: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/04/wikileaks-site-s...WIPO has assembled links to various ccTLD's policies; here is their page for .ch http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/cctld/ch/index.html