This is the best advertisement for Epson I've ever seen. I know Canon wasn't thinking of it that way but being on the fence between the Canon and Epson photo printers this sways me strongly toward Epson.
Why Epson ? Canon is a shit company since 20 years but Epson is not far away. Yes i can use non Epson ink after i press ok on the warning after every print, but it will print missaligned. A thing which, automagically, does not happen with Epson ink.
You REALLY don't want to go down the road with Epson. Historically Canon has been the best in terms of reliable "inkjet". I still shiver at the nightmare of the Epson printers in the 00s and early 10s. They used this really agressive ink that while produced beautiful print, easily clogged up the expensive printheads embedded in the printers. The school district I worked for lost easily 100+ units to this issue. And the tactics they used to prevent refills. God what a nightmare. All the printer companies suck (yes even brother) they just suck in different ways and at different times.
I have an Epson R2880 that needs keyhole surgery because of this stupid ink. Stunning, heavenly prints but needs to be constantly used. The alternative ink feed options are excellent, however, such as the bulk options. I inject TP ink into TP cartridges now.
I have a Canon all-in-one inkjet. I almost always buy third-party cartridges off of Amazon. They seem fine, but I'm a basic user, printing only what's necessary. It always surprises me when I see the screen say it's an authentic Canon cartridge. How is this accomplished? Cloning the chips? Reverse engineering? Taking chips from recycled cartridges?
Depends on the model. I used to tinker with tons of inkjet + laser models when I worked for my high school and then university IT departments. Some companies even sold bed of nail type programmers that would reset the chip on the fly. On many cartridges, the chip on the cartridge is just a simple SPI chip that maintains a print count. Easy to just erase and reset. This was common in the 00s and early 10s im sure newer printers have upped the ante. Things such as efuses, cartridges signing with a secret key could be possible and its probably inevitable if it hasn't happened already.
Model? I've read the newer Brothers have issues especially with non OEM toner. I want to buy a good, reliable, Linux capable, non internet required printer and I'd love to get a Brother. Curious to how their current offerings compare to the older ones.
20 comments
[ 5.1 ms ] story [ 66.9 ms ] thread[1]:https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31860131
I've tossed it into the e-waste container and bought a Brother laser printer, and it's been rocking on for 8 years so far.
13 years, same drum for Brothers laser. 7,500+ pages.
6 years for Brothers color ink-jet.
Canon inkjet, went into the trash after 13 months.
Have had no problems with non oem toner with this model.
Also for those curious about the Linux compatibility of Brother printers, the list on here is your guide.
https://github.com/pdewacht/brlaser
$159 USD
https://www.brother-usa.com/products/hll2370dw