Google has supported its primary users for years - those users are the people paying them to run ads. I haven't seen or heard anything about google making it harder to pay them to display ads.
While I no doubt believe these things are true, these are interesting stances coming from people knowingly selling their companies to Google, who has had this reputation for a while. Did these CEOs have users front of mind?
It's not blame because I'm not sure I could turn down retire-in-three-years money, but it is a choice they made for their users.
I assume this was a rhetorical question, because I, at least, assume that most CEOs care for their users extends only to the point that they can monetize them. Which means it stops dead when the company is sold.
13 comments
[ 5.9 ms ] story [ 50.2 ms ] threadWhat is a mandatory retention period? Sounds like a stock vesting schedule to me.
It's not blame because I'm not sure I could turn down retire-in-three-years money, but it is a choice they made for their users.