That Glamour article is a decent summary of Rowling's essay and tweets that got some of these activists riled up, but it rather downplays the levels of vitriol and abuse Rowling has been targeted with in response to her very reasonable concerns about the impacts on women's rights. Much of it being death and rape threats from angry males, which I believe rather proves her point about the need for separate female-only spaces.
I'm not sure Hacker News is the best forum for this. But as I realise that the new Hogwarts game criss-crosses issues of tech and gaming with trans issues, I'll venture to share some thoughts (a decision I hope I don't come to regret).
Rowling is definitely a very divisive figurehead and so gets more focus than most, but all threats of abuse and violence are wrong. However, from what I have seen the vitriol and abuse (from a vocal few) has gone both ways from both sides, but when it comes to actual violence then trans people have definitely been physically harmed more (and arguably face more emotional and mental abuse). The association of several of those Rowling has commended and promoted on this issue with far-right causes (in some cases even anti-female) is also a cause for worry.
As to whether any of the concerns are reasonable that would take a lengthy discussion to cover them all. Suffice it to say that a large proportion of women do not feel that their rights are impacted by trans rights (and would want their views respected too), which may lead to pitting one group of (cis) women against another.
There is also the potential for (cis) women's rights to be impacted by legislation that impacts trans access to female spaces (such as the potential for women needing to prove they are women (and the violations of privacy that may entail), women who are perceived to be masculine being kicked out of female spaces (as has already happened), and the potential of female-to-male trans men being forced to use women's bathrooms, which many women would not feel comfortable with).
It seems to me that trans issues are being capitalised upon by those who care little for women's rights at all (the religious right), and by politicians trying to draw attention away from bigger failings in their policies and performance. This makes it difficult to have a mature conversation not focused on extreme cases, remote possibilities and reasonable and respectful solutions.
Personally my interactions and experiences with trans people have been positive ones, devoid any of the extremes that the press likes to focus on. I also know people who find some of the issues confusing and have sincere worries about statistically uncommon situations. If both sides could meet in a spirit of seeking understanding and respect I think a lot more progress could be made.
3 comments
[ 3.7 ms ] story [ 18.2 ms ] threadhttps://twitter.com/ContraPoints/status/1626231558842765312
This article gives an overview of the controversy from the start to present -
https://www.glamour.com/story/a-complete-breakdown-of-the-jk...
Rowling is definitely a very divisive figurehead and so gets more focus than most, but all threats of abuse and violence are wrong. However, from what I have seen the vitriol and abuse (from a vocal few) has gone both ways from both sides, but when it comes to actual violence then trans people have definitely been physically harmed more (and arguably face more emotional and mental abuse). The association of several of those Rowling has commended and promoted on this issue with far-right causes (in some cases even anti-female) is also a cause for worry.
As to whether any of the concerns are reasonable that would take a lengthy discussion to cover them all. Suffice it to say that a large proportion of women do not feel that their rights are impacted by trans rights (and would want their views respected too), which may lead to pitting one group of (cis) women against another.
There is also the potential for (cis) women's rights to be impacted by legislation that impacts trans access to female spaces (such as the potential for women needing to prove they are women (and the violations of privacy that may entail), women who are perceived to be masculine being kicked out of female spaces (as has already happened), and the potential of female-to-male trans men being forced to use women's bathrooms, which many women would not feel comfortable with).
It seems to me that trans issues are being capitalised upon by those who care little for women's rights at all (the religious right), and by politicians trying to draw attention away from bigger failings in their policies and performance. This makes it difficult to have a mature conversation not focused on extreme cases, remote possibilities and reasonable and respectful solutions.
Personally my interactions and experiences with trans people have been positive ones, devoid any of the extremes that the press likes to focus on. I also know people who find some of the issues confusing and have sincere worries about statistically uncommon situations. If both sides could meet in a spirit of seeking understanding and respect I think a lot more progress could be made.