Ditto , the only inconvenience is finding another backup/storage provider.
This demonstrates the dangers of SOPA quite nicely.
My worry is that in an attempt to create lock-in software vendors will try and tie storage and applications together so if you lose one you lose both.
Let's imagine something like basecamp got taken down , that would be a major disaster for many businesses.
They don't only lose the app but they lose all of the data.
Yup - they might tie it down so terribly, but I just have a dropbox accounts across a couple of computers - I have the same account on my personal PC, my office laptop and my crappy Jolicloud cheap linux laptop I use for surfing while watching TV.
So as long as I turn each on once in a while I not only have a cloud back-up, I also have 3 'physical' ones.
If one day Dropbox through the 'kill switch' - I'd just have to use one of the other devices without connecting to the internet first - as I don't like to leave machines running needlessly only one is ever on at a time.
In a way I think it's good that Dropbox limits the amount I can store - it makes me focus on the files I /NEED/ to have for a long time, and makes me do the work of backing up the other lesser items - like photos (that I care about but aren't going to lose me £££ if I lose them).
Unless the Dropbox service sends a command to your Dropbox client to delete the files as part of its "death".
If somebody other than the people who made and run Dropbox were responsible for the action of shutting it down, this might happen accidentally. Or if the service was hacked.
It's still a good idea to have your own local backups.
This is true for any service, cloud or not, that has permission to write to your hard drive. This ability has nothing to do with storage, and this risk is much, much less likely than simple bankruptcy or whatever.
You misunderstand my point. Not backing up files on your hard drive because they're in Dropbox is not safe. Dropbox has built in functionality to delete those files from your hard drive. If any one of your clients or your account is compromised, or the Dropbox service is hacked, these files could disappear. Hence why you need backups.
Also, if the FBI starts pulling servers in a random order to shut Dropbox down, are you confident that wont cause Dropbox's systems to incorrectly send delete commands to your client just before the service disappears? If you are, you shouldn't be. Not after the "log in to any account without a password" issue of last year.
I guess the key here is, are you storing files or are you mirroring files?
It would seem that the best possible solution is to run your own file storage service, but who has the time/desire to manage that? For a free product like Dropbox, I'm content (for now, at least) to make that tradeoff. I don't have to worry about clients or syncing or servers, etc. I just save my files on my computer and then they appear on my other devices.
Perhaps the trick (to avoid data loss) is to backup locally as much as possible. I do backups once every 1-2 weeks depending on how often I'm nagged by Time Machine. That seems to be the only way to get the convenience of cloud storage while also not losing data if they go away.
For people who don't have local backups, it's going to bite you one day. Here's how to set up free, hourly, incremental, encrypted backups with minimal effort. I do it on my laptop:
My wife subscribed to an online, Quicken-like service a few years ago that went under, and then refused to allow her to download her information. After that, she realized how vulnerable her data was, since she has no clue who has her data, or what happened to it.
I don't use Dropbox or any online file service for exactly this reason.
I should really download all my gmail, but it's a major hassle having to take care of that, but I realize that's another major point of failure for me.
yes, I know I can use POP to download my mail, but the thing I've found is that it creates a huge, fragmented multi-gigabyte mail file in Thunderbird, which is annoying to have to take care of. But yes, I realize #firstworldproblems :)
A quick search for "imap to maildir sync" shows up several free apps for syncing between IMAP and Maildir. That way, each email would live in its own file. Might be more manageable.
As has been said time and time again, you should have at least 3 copies of every file you care about. One local, one local backup, and one remote backup.
If you need to restore a file quickly or the remote backup goes down you have your local backup. If your house burns down you have your remote backup.
I would modify that to include one offline backup. If it's connected to other systems in an automated way then there's usually a way that it can be accidentally overwritten. Often there could be an event which cascades through all of your backups before you realise.
The article's claim that AWS et al would do better under the circumstances seems dubious to say the least. Do they have an example of a more enterprise-oriented cloud service going under to generalize from?
Not to be a broken record for everyone else but I always keep a local copy (several) of all my data. I have a folder called "Store" and it is a large tree of everything I ever plan to keep long term. Parts of it are on various cloud services (mainly DropBox) depending on the type of access I need but everything resides locally somewhere in that tree structure. From letters I wrote in 1990 to photos (critical ones) to pretty much every line of code I've ever written. That folder is backed up across several devices by a nightly sync because I came perilously close to loosing it a couple years back when I got lax. In short, when it comes to my long term data I trust no one. :) Not even myself most of the time!
25 comments
[ 4.4 ms ] story [ 58.7 ms ] threadThis demonstrates the dangers of SOPA quite nicely.
My worry is that in an attempt to create lock-in software vendors will try and tie storage and applications together so if you lose one you lose both.
Let's imagine something like basecamp got taken down , that would be a major disaster for many businesses. They don't only lose the app but they lose all of the data.
So as long as I turn each on once in a while I not only have a cloud back-up, I also have 3 'physical' ones.
If one day Dropbox through the 'kill switch' - I'd just have to use one of the other devices without connecting to the internet first - as I don't like to leave machines running needlessly only one is ever on at a time.
In a way I think it's good that Dropbox limits the amount I can store - it makes me focus on the files I /NEED/ to have for a long time, and makes me do the work of backing up the other lesser items - like photos (that I care about but aren't going to lose me £££ if I lose them).
If somebody other than the people who made and run Dropbox were responsible for the action of shutting it down, this might happen accidentally. Or if the service was hacked.
It's still a good idea to have your own local backups.
Also, if the FBI starts pulling servers in a random order to shut Dropbox down, are you confident that wont cause Dropbox's systems to incorrectly send delete commands to your client just before the service disappears? If you are, you shouldn't be. Not after the "log in to any account without a password" issue of last year.
It would seem that the best possible solution is to run your own file storage service, but who has the time/desire to manage that? For a free product like Dropbox, I'm content (for now, at least) to make that tradeoff. I don't have to worry about clients or syncing or servers, etc. I just save my files on my computer and then they appear on my other devices.
Perhaps the trick (to avoid data loss) is to backup locally as much as possible. I do backups once every 1-2 weeks depending on how often I'm nagged by Time Machine. That seems to be the only way to get the convenience of cloud storage while also not losing data if they go away.
https://grepular.com/Secure_Free_Incremental_and_Instant_Bac...
I don't use Dropbox or any online file service for exactly this reason.
I should really download all my gmail, but it's a major hassle having to take care of that, but I realize that's another major point of failure for me.
This is not a major hassle if you actually care about retaining access to your email.
[1] http://www.ioncannon.net/system-administration/97/using-fetc...
If you need to restore a file quickly or the remote backup goes down you have your local backup. If your house burns down you have your remote backup.