6 comments

[ 2.0 ms ] story [ 26.0 ms ] thread
You go through school and pride yourself on honor.

You get a job, boss hands you a competator hadware. You study it, thinking how humiliating.

God said reverse engineering is okay for young engineers. God has nuances, even on adultery. Remarriage? "More babies" (Some countries need them.)

At graphic technology I made chips to replace toner cartridge chips. Complete waste of time, undoing somebody's work. My operating system is a far better use of my talent. It was actually CIA torture--I have honor and I had to burn "copyright xerox" into my chips. Scum.

God says... C:\LoseThos\www.losethos.com\text\QUIX.TXT

the one hand thou dost tell me that the barber and curate of our village are here in company with us, and on the other I find myself shut up in a cage, and know in my heart that no power on earth that was not supernatural would have been able to shut me in, what wouldst thou have me say or think, but that my enchantment is of a sort that transcends all I have ever read of in all the histories that deal with knights-errant that have been enchanted? So thou mayest set thy mind at rest as to the idea t

----

I'm Forest Gump--the toner chip case went to the supreme court and we won. Lexmark VS Static Control. Static Control was a competitator doing what we did.

I was at Ticketmaster during the anti-trust case.

You still seem to be in denial that I'm higher in the justice department than you.

God says... C:\LoseThos\www.losethos.com\text\QUIX.TXT

d great were the attentions shown to Don Quixote by the newly married couple, who felt themselves under an obligation to him for coming forward in defence of their cause; and they exalted his wisdom to the same level with his courage, rating him as a Cid in arms, and a Cicero in eloquence. Worthy Sancho enjoyed himself for three days at the expense of the pair, from whom they learned that the sham wound was not a scheme arranged with the fair Quiteria, but a device of Basilio's, who counted on exact

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexmark_Intl_v._Static_Control_...

Yep, pretty much a waste of time on 4+ layer boards
So true.

I'd argue it's probably a waste of time on greater than 2 layer boards myself (having had the pleasure of doing this on a Telequipment D83 scope amp module) unless you want to boil them and get the laminated layers out and then don't even ask about vias.

What is even more of a pain about doing this is that on traces that carry high frequencies, intentional parasitic inductances and capacitances are sometimes designed into the board and there is no way on hell you're going to reverse engineer them.

If this is for reverse engineering and repair, it's best just to "replace at the border" i.e. replace the controller assembly with something electrically compatible much as they did when they went from relay logic to PLCs back in the 70s and 80s.

I think the pros use x-ray
You'd think so but they don't see through ground planes.
I found most circuits are based on generic engineering designs. Note the chip numbers, get datasheets, and draw a basic block diagram. From that, draw up a mock diagram that could work, then reference the board for the details and make changes. The result is fairly accurate.