10 comments

[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 20.4 ms ] thread
This might explain part of the current situation.
I'm not sure since the issues go back years not months
I don't see why this is relevant. She's only been there 2 months, she barely has enough time to understand the layout, she most definitely had nothing to do with the current situation.
I can’t see how anyone could seriously blame her for any of this, I don’t think the poster intended to imply that.

This is pretty amusing in retrospect though. The last chapter is definitely an important one!

> I am excited to lead SVB’s outstanding risk management team and continue to build SVB’s risk management framework and capabilities in this important next chapter of the firm’s trajectory,” said Olson.

I am not implying she is to blame at all.
Perhaps brought in to be the fall person, eh?
The issue lies in the fact the role was vacant for 8 months. By the time she arrived, it was too late.
I mean, the title has already been editorialised. It’s valid to criticise the incorrect focus.
More importantly, why did the previous one leave? What did she know?