It seems more reasonable to think "The social contract is erroding and so more shoplifting is happening"
It's not like people consider antisocial behavior by default unless they are desperate and driven to by a society that's failing them and failing to give them hope that they have other options to survive.
> Knightscope retains ownership of its robots, and the client pays about $6 to $9 per hour for an annual contract, Stephens said.
That’s cheaper than I would’ve expected - wonder whether they get hit with a bunch of additional fees beyond simply possessing the robot - operation, gathering and storing surveillance data, auditing data, even just interconnecting all the systems with whatever they’ve already got at Lowe’s
because they are the "daddy" now .. wait until you find out that you cannot request records held in private, on you. Add to that the low-cost and culture of incrimination ... and .. once you get on that list, for any reason.. oh well
11 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 37.3 ms ] threadIt's not like people consider antisocial behavior by default unless they are desperate and driven to by a society that's failing them and failing to give them hope that they have other options to survive.
That’s cheaper than I would’ve expected - wonder whether they get hit with a bunch of additional fees beyond simply possessing the robot - operation, gathering and storing surveillance data, auditing data, even just interconnecting all the systems with whatever they’ve already got at Lowe’s
Or maybe detect non-courteous behavior by man or machine using mandatory OTA real-time data collection?
Or something that can retrospectively charge you with a violation based on your past driving history as recorded by your own vehicle as you go?
Oh wait . . .
The last one seems like an odd inclusion. Since when does Lowes scrutinize potential customers based on a specific type of criminal record?