Yeah, this is deliberately misleading. Note the use of "Open AI" vs OpenAI. I wonder if the aim is to provoke legal action over the right to use the phrase "Open AI" and have a "OpenAI isn't open so why do they get to call themselves that" discussion in court.
TL;DR activism is my bet. Or hoping for a settlement to avoid said discussion and transfer the domain, perhaps even more likely.
While I don't like that a for-profit company uses the name "OpenAI" to develop models that are ostensibly closed (no source, no weights, and for GPT-4, we don't even know basic data like number of parameters); the authors of this website should really look for a different name. This is misleading.
“Open AI website and services use Stable Diffusion for generations. By using our services, you are required to comply with the Stable Diffusion license terms.”
8 comments
[ 4.8 ms ] story [ 33.3 ms ] threadTL;DR activism is my bet. Or hoping for a settlement to avoid said discussion and transfer the domain, perhaps even more likely.