Agreed. I'm a huge fan of his work, but every time I visit his site I cringe at that header. Maybe he has a wall-sized monitor and he doesn't notice the problem.
I was just at a PPA conference (Imaging USA in New Orleans), and every session started with a PPA rep saying "No photography. All slides are protected by copyright." I don't even know where to begin.
You might steal their 1024x768 representation of a photograph with some of the worst color accuracy possible (because it's a projector) while still looking acceptable! And, with some up-scaling, might even be useful as a laptop's wallpaper. Well, as long as you can get rid of the distortions caused by your angle (maybe you used a tilt-shift lens?), and all the imperfections from the projection surface, fix all the color issues that came from the poor representation, and somehow explain why you needed a tripod in the back of the room. Oh noes!
I jest, but they probably put that their as a CYA :/. Also, technically, all of their slides and images are protected by copyright. They did, after all, create them.
Look, some people just have different agendas than you do. It doesn't mean they're out of touch--just out of touch with your own agenda, the one you don't think you have, but do.
7 comments
[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 23.2 ms ] threadI jest, but they probably put that their as a CYA :/. Also, technically, all of their slides and images are protected by copyright. They did, after all, create them.
[edit: clarifying, improving grammar]
Look, some people just have different agendas than you do. It doesn't mean they're out of touch--just out of touch with your own agenda, the one you don't think you have, but do.