[–] camkego 3y ago ↗ The FDIC chose a chart design that can display up to 25 bank failures per month (See 2020 for examples of how the Y axis is used for failures).Of course, too much shouldn't be read into this, but it's interesting they chose such a chart rather than a table listing failures. [–] orangepanda 3y ago ↗ Forward comparability? [–] [deleted] 3y ago ↗ (comment deleted) [–] StringyBob 3y ago ↗ 24 in one month for July 2009! [–] nivertech 3y ago ↗ There were 140 bank failures in 2009 in total!https://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/bank/bfb2009.html
[–] StringyBob 3y ago ↗ 24 in one month for July 2009! [–] nivertech 3y ago ↗ There were 140 bank failures in 2009 in total!https://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/bank/bfb2009.html
[–] nivertech 3y ago ↗ There were 140 bank failures in 2009 in total!https://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/bank/bfb2009.html
[–] hbrav 3y ago ↗ This chart is much more interesting, since you can see the total assets involved this year are close to that of the 2008 crisis: https://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/bank/index.html(Assuming I'm reading this correctly - please correct me if I'm misunderstanding the y-axis!)
6 comments
[ 1.8 ms ] story [ 38.7 ms ] threadOf course, too much shouldn't be read into this, but it's interesting they chose such a chart rather than a table listing failures.
https://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/bank/bfb2009.html
(Assuming I'm reading this correctly - please correct me if I'm misunderstanding the y-axis!)