[–] rossdavidh 3y ago ↗ Apparently Amazon laid off some of their editors. [–] [dead] tap-snap-or-nap 3y ago ↗ [flagged] [–] pcthrowaway 3y ago ↗ They laid off the manager of those docs, so was written by an ass man.
[–] ackfoobar 3y ago ↗ Good, someone archived it.https://web.archive.org/web/20230321204151/https://docs.aws.... [–] idsout 3y ago ↗ It's still showing the same message at the source lol [–] DangitBobby 3y ago ↗ Says not available. [–] ackfoobar 3y ago ↗ It is now available again. I was wondering if Amazon had issued a takedown request. [–] aendruk 3y ago ↗ You’re welcome! Made easy by a couple of Firefox bookmark keywords: wm https://web.archive.org/web/*/%S ws https://web.archive.org/save/%S
[–] DangitBobby 3y ago ↗ Says not available. [–] ackfoobar 3y ago ↗ It is now available again. I was wondering if Amazon had issued a takedown request.
[–] ackfoobar 3y ago ↗ It is now available again. I was wondering if Amazon had issued a takedown request.
[–] aendruk 3y ago ↗ You’re welcome! Made easy by a couple of Firefox bookmark keywords: wm https://web.archive.org/web/*/%S ws https://web.archive.org/save/%S
[–] iLoveOncall 3y ago ↗ Almost as good as the Amazon job posting hiring for people "interested in building hyper-scale database services in my butt": https://web.archive.org/web/20211014200658/https://www.amazo... [–] SparkyMcUnicorn 3y ago ↗ Amasson really has a theme going here... [–] plandis 3y ago ↗ Looks like someone didn’t realize they had cloud to butt installed lmao [–] jwestbury 3y ago ↗ Correct. The cloud-to-butt plugin was quite literally banned at AWS after this. But most of us at AWS found it hilarious.
[–] plandis 3y ago ↗ Looks like someone didn’t realize they had cloud to butt installed lmao [–] jwestbury 3y ago ↗ Correct. The cloud-to-butt plugin was quite literally banned at AWS after this. But most of us at AWS found it hilarious.
[–] jwestbury 3y ago ↗ Correct. The cloud-to-butt plugin was quite literally banned at AWS after this. But most of us at AWS found it hilarious.
[–] sam_lowry_ 3y ago ↗ Also check amazon.com. (with the last dot) for a subtler fuck-up. [–] smegsicle 3y ago ↗ leading internet technology company doesn't know how to support basic fqdn syntax sign of the times [–] grepfru_it 3y ago ↗ Interesting, my sites have a similar problem. Time to add this to the test suite [–] smegsicle 3y ago ↗ an issue with routing by domain name and not expecting the extra character, or something else entirely? [–] grepfru_it 3y ago ↗ routing by domain name. recently made an infra change and switched from apache to traefik for the loadbalancer
[–] smegsicle 3y ago ↗ leading internet technology company doesn't know how to support basic fqdn syntax sign of the times [–] grepfru_it 3y ago ↗ Interesting, my sites have a similar problem. Time to add this to the test suite [–] smegsicle 3y ago ↗ an issue with routing by domain name and not expecting the extra character, or something else entirely? [–] grepfru_it 3y ago ↗ routing by domain name. recently made an infra change and switched from apache to traefik for the loadbalancer
[–] grepfru_it 3y ago ↗ Interesting, my sites have a similar problem. Time to add this to the test suite [–] smegsicle 3y ago ↗ an issue with routing by domain name and not expecting the extra character, or something else entirely? [–] grepfru_it 3y ago ↗ routing by domain name. recently made an infra change and switched from apache to traefik for the loadbalancer
[–] smegsicle 3y ago ↗ an issue with routing by domain name and not expecting the extra character, or something else entirely? [–] grepfru_it 3y ago ↗ routing by domain name. recently made an infra change and switched from apache to traefik for the loadbalancer
[–] grepfru_it 3y ago ↗ routing by domain name. recently made an infra change and switched from apache to traefik for the loadbalancer
24 comments
[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 70.2 ms ] threadhttps://web.archive.org/web/20230321204151/https://docs.aws....