1 comment

[ 5.2 ms ] story [ 10.4 ms ] thread
Ah, the usual strategy of laundering a real science paper from 2007 on data collected in 2004 from 2002 era technology to give a publication date of 2018 try and make solar look bad

This on top of all the other usual slimy tactics. Including trying to pretend the agency that brough us these predictions https://i.redd.it/ojpyazm6xuia1.jpg is capable of making accurate cost projections for 15 years in the future.

Have you ever considered reporting an honest source? Or does that not support the narrative?