26 comments

[ 4.4 ms ] story [ 75.8 ms ] thread
That title is pretty impressive/ big on mobile!
It's just bad unresponsive CSS.

It's so ugly to have the words break anywhere and for the intentional line breaks to still occur anyway.

All they needed to do was use media queries for at least three screen widths and adjust the font size in there accordingly.

In the demo I put the obama prank photo http://karpathy.github.io/2012/10/22/state-of-computer-visio... and asked "Why is this picture funny?" and it responded "Question: Why is this picture funny? Answer: President Obama is taller than the average person."
What's the GPT-4 answer to why that picture is funny?
Tbh I’m not sure why the pic is funny. And I am human
Luckily the article explains it right below the caption ;-)
he's stepping on the scale making the guy seem heavier than he is
Furthermore the man on the scale is faced the other way and wouldn’t know someone is stepping on the scale. There’s an element of theory of mind there. You would have to understand that the man on the scale is unaware of Obama’s action.
The article points this out and several things we all instantly recognize.
Thanks. I was looking at the picture on my phone and it was difficult to see what was going on in the picture.
That’s because it’s very posed so it’s not that funny.
But you understand why people might find it funny, and what people in the image are thinking, you have a mental model of them. That's the point.
Is it something to do with the idiom of putting a thumb on the scale, meaning using your power to influence the outcome of something?
Has this one fared better with other image prompt models? It’s a great little challenge, I’m curious for a follow up!
Even at this scale the model's able to answer questions fairly impressively, but I created an image with some distinct shapes in different positions and it didn't go well [0]. I think however they're doing the image encoding doesn't capture positional information which, to my mind, limits a lot of use cases.

[0] https://i.postimg.cc/GtrGs8mw/Screenshot-2023-03-28-at-5-19-...

it's not the image embedding. It's the objective task. Image to text is simply not good enough. It's really lossy and the datasets are garbage so it's not very robust.
I always like to try these zero-shot models on things outside of the "normal" COCO classes. Here are some chess board queries:

Counting: https://imgur.com/KTuQ1Bv

Parse the chess board: https://imgur.com/2zYFK1P

(Result): https://imgur.com/Ei4MAl7

Few-Shot Object Detection (Pascal VOC): https://imgur.com/gZkDMn8

Few-Shot Object Detection (simplified): https://imgur.com/Hk8QGMd

Not quite there yet. I've been more impressed with the other new zero-shot multimodal models like Grounding DINO and Azure Dense Captioning. Really looking forward to putting multimodal GPT-4 through its paces as well.

> Parse the chess board:

Could it be that the actual issue has to do with it having trouble with small tokens (letters, numbers)?

Does it give a different result if you ask it to answer in a format like this?

> Please name what kind of piece is on each square of this board > A1: white rook > A2: white pawn > A3: empty > A4: empty > ...

Prompting can be so unintuitive sometimes. Maybe it just has an issue with the output representation or something...

What are the key features of Open Flamingo, and how does it compare to other frameworks for training multimodal LLMs?
What’re the techniques that’ll get this to run on a single GPU?
Most of the parameters are in the language model (LLaMa-7B). So, they'd pretty much be the same techniques that would let LLaMa run on a single GPU -- especially lower precision tricks. If you only want to run inference/forward (no training), it should be pretty doable.

You can almost definitely run it on consumer GPU if you swap out the language model for something smaller as well (although the performance would definitely not be as good on the language side).

(comment deleted)