50 comments

[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 102 ms ] thread
what is it about ?
basically everything on wikipedia is ordered into lists. many of those lists are further organized into lists of lists. those lists of lists are organized in this article and its a list of lists of lists.

for example one of the lists of lists on 'list of lists of lists' is 'lists of american films' and one of the lists there is 'list of american films of 1900' which contains, among others, 'Clowns Spinning Hats'.

I actually found one list of lists of lists on 'list of lists of lists'. 'Lists of Americans' > 'Lists of African Americans' > 'List of African American Jurists' > 'Dennis Archer'. Going to see if I can find another and create the epic 'list of lists of lists of lists'.

You can put the list of lists of lists on your list of lists of lists of lists. Also, 'Isotope lists' > 'Isotope lists, 0-24' > 'Isotopes of Helium' > 'Helium-2' though I don't know if that counts.
I'm still waiting for the list of lists that do not contain themselves.
Ha that took a minute to work out. Well played.
No problem. It's lists all the way down.
That's no problem until you want to list all lists of lists that do not contain themselves.
Make it a category instead and you don't have to worry either way.
Oh dang, beat me to it, ignore the other comment ;)
This is all fun and games until Russell's paradox rears its ugly head.
I'm surprised it doesn't yet include this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celestial_Emporium_of_Benevolen...

I guess this is a list of lists of things who do not belong to the Emperor.

EDIT: now realized it's a list of lists of lists. Somebody should create a list of Borges' lists, then, including the aforementioned.

Contains a "List of lists of national institutions and symbols" - listception.
In other news, data can be listed in a hierarchal manner.
Well, the awesome Yvain (aka Scott Siskind) must be mentioned here, since he made years ago a list of lists of lists of lists.

http://www.raikoth.net/lololol.html

Please heed the warning in the bottom.

Does this page exist in the other languages? Can we go a level up?
As someone else in this thread mentioned, the page has a link to itself in the L section, which means that we can't (and don't need to) go a level up. Like any good metalist, this list contains itself.
Next up: a list of lists that do not contain themselves

(Punchline drumroll.)

Ha. That's actually pretty funny. To state the obvious: that's impossible. If the list omits itself, it's incomplete. It it includes itself, it's invalid.
Thanks, Bertrand, for clearing that up.
Of course, that set contains itself: scroll to L and there's a self-reference.
Don't click on that link. It could create a black hole.
But it's a list of lists of lists, so it should only contain lists of lists--well, by the strict definition, a nested list is still a list. So, technically I suppose it can be there, but it reads as list of (lists of lists), where the depth of each level is clearly shown.
I wish someone would compile a list of links to these sorts of pages...
But where's the page that contains a list of links to all pages that don't contain links to themselves?
google page rank v.s. wikipedia... round 1, FIGHT!
I was sad to see that List of lists of lists of lists was created, but deleted. Arbitrary limits on tree depth make me a sad coder.

Given that this is clearly a tree, I'd prefer they just have a WP:Lists, with each of the relevant groupings of lists listed there, and so on.

I've always thought that the last step should be "Lists of non-list items" to ensure that, among other things, lists don't contain themselves.
While you're all punning away in a recursive delirium, I think it's worth noting the distinct absence of science topics: lists of proteins? lists of genes? lists of algorithms? lists of particles? lists of reactions? And, my favorite: lists of catalysts?
Not to mention the lists of lisps.
Yo dawg, I heard you like lists!