Ask HN: People with direct knowledge of YouTube Algorithm-why the repeats?
I get that YouTube and virtually all social media sites want to maximize clicks. I get that YouTube really doesn't give a rat's ass about what I want in that context: they think it's worth far more to override my preferences and add all kinds of channels to my feed than I want. But if you have direct knowledge of the algorithm, please tell me why I can watch a video to the end, then have it recommended for days, weeks, or months after, even when I have dutifully upvoted or commented. What's in it for YouTube? Just because I liked a video by Kyle Kulinsky or Jordan Peterson in 2022 doesn't mean I'm still dying to watch it in 2023. And if you want to force shit down my throat, why give up valuable screen real estate to videos I already saw?
86 comments
[ 4.6 ms ] story [ 162 ms ] threadi think people do like watching the same video more than once sometimes though.
Oh I get it now. Ai yai yai.
It’s a pretty obscure reference and I did not get it when I made my initial response.
Here is an old, deleted, reddit thread about people who re-watch the same Youtube video over and over: https://www.reddit.com/r/TooAfraidToAsk/comments/h7fqv9/is_i...
It sold a million copies worldwide on release, and was a Top Ten single in 30-odd countries (number 1 in 24), so you know you're not alone in liking it.
Rick Astley is most famous for this one but he had something like eight top ten singles in a row. It can't *all* have been down to Stock, Aitken, and Waterman...
I do however watch “Picard make it so (let it snow)” every year. Some videos I’ll watch more than once throughout the year.
On the other hand it’s rare I’ll watch a Numberphile or Tom Scott video more than once, and when I do I deliberately seek it out
They DGAF if you like what you see, only that they can hit you with more targeted ads from paying customers -- and boy howdy does the rile-em-up lobby pay big money.
As mentioned in a previous thread: you're the product, not the customer.
But coming back to your question.
This question reminds me of a complaint that I heard from multiple people about Amazon: why is Amazon recommending me a product I just bought? Or a less generous manifestation of this sentiment "duh, Amazon is so stupid, it recommend something I bought give minutes ago".
In reality, people don't realize how often they buy the same and similar stuff again and again. You bought a usb hub for home, you like it, so you but it for the office. If you didn't like it, you may buy three different usb hubs to make sure you find a good one. You like a book, so you but the same for your sister as a gift. Bought some socks, you enjoy using them, so you buy another 10 so that you don't need to worry about socks for the next two years. You realize you love funny socks, so you keep buying more socks.
The same happens with videos. I don't mind watching a video about streams by Venkat Subramaniam every now and then. A conference talk about regex is recommended to me again?? Hmm, actually, I might watch it again because I don't remember half of it and I remember she prepared a great talk.
Yeah... this is not true for the vast majority of non-consumable products without some sort of time delay.
If you bought 20 Zebra gel pens (best pens on the market, no affiliation just satisfied consumer) you don't need 20 Zebra gel pens for a sale refraction period of at least an hour. Immediately re-advertising is a poor advertising model, conceptually, and I'd really need to see a lot of evidence that this is wrong across a wide variety of products to move away from that prior.
Amazon sort of handles these things in the Amazon UI with "people who bought X also bought Y" but they really should be showing that for their ads: instead of "here are results for your recent search" (which likely shows you the thing you already got) it could do "here are things people who buy stuff near the top of your recent search also buy".
Regardless, as far as I am concerned, the best commentary ever on this topic was CollegeHumor doing the Targetted Salesman skit, where the ad engine is represented by a human salesman shoving products at you all day: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KbKdKcGJ4tM
Took several years to even consider the statistical power of ad effectiveness.[0]
[0] https://www.jstor.org/stable/26372642
If you buy a USB hub you might like it enough to buy another.
If you buy a washer, you probably won't like it enough to buy another.
But if you're a landlord, and you buy a washer, you might like it enough to buy 10 more.
Whilst I get that's the easy answer from YouTube perspective, I refuse to believe that there is nothing on the entirety of YouTube they can't recommend. It's just sad as a viewer to think how much I'm missing because they're recommending that "This is how empires fall" video for the tenth time.
So, most "consumables".
Obviously the algorithm has no way to know your friend isn't standing right there right now and demanding to be shown something you've already seen but think is cool...
At least, it borders on worthless for me.
Why would they care what your experience is? You're the product, not the customer.
I would assume that all the minecraft, sports, and vlogger stuff is what I get because it’s trending, but i also have zero interest in any of that stuff at all.
1. Music, which often lends towards repeat content
2. Children as a demographic, which any parent will tell you will watch the exact same movie/show/video on repeat ad nauseam.
Because of these, it's likely that YouTube has found that repeats (in general) drive more engagement.
I get the same short suggestions repeatedly but sometimes they're mixed in with very new, low quality stuff with no comments or likes.
My youtube time has gone down precipitously, which is a good thing for me, but not for youtube.
I wish they would improve the algorithm to distinguish between things I want to replay like music versus things I want to see once like a documentary.
Scrolling through some of the comments on Jordan Peterson videos I have found that his fanbase does seem to be a little on the fanatical side. (Just to be clear this is not a knock against Jordan Peterson - I actually find him pretty interesting. Nor do I think his fans are uniquely fanatical - lots of YouTubers have fanatical fans. But because he is in the realm of self-help and politics, and he tends to be very opinionated, he does tend to attract some really hardcore fans who I could imagine rewatching his videos from time to time).
I can think of many videos like this, that pop up in a feed after many years and you’ll see the comments like “see y’all again in a year when the algorithm brings this back” or “I always click when this video is recommended”.
I have several friends who’ll rewatch whole shows again and again for a similar reason. There’s the comfort of something familiar.
So I guess I don’t mind when youtube does this