27 comments

[ 4.6 ms ] story [ 57.5 ms ] thread
It's called suppression, and to fully understand who, why, what and how, I suggest to read the following lengthy article series: http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1023-financia...

And if you want a book full of suppressed science like this: http://www.amazon.com/Source-Field-Investigations-Civilizati...

The author is an optimist, he says the tyranny and suppression will soon end.

Can you imagine a post like this on HN two or three years ago?
There have always been cranks. Just downvote, flag and move on.
The seriousness of that information warrants it to be posted absolutely everywhere. This is way beyond the point where I care what people think about me. People need to know how deceived they were, and still are. This has to end, and it will end.
I don't really care about your downvotes. I expect reasonable comments, which you obviously don't have.
You might want to read a bit about the Federal Reserve Bank system: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_System

To quote: "The U.S. Government receives all of the system's annual profits, after a statutory dividend of 6% on member banks' capital investment is paid, and an account surplus is maintained"

I kinda feel sorry that every time this kind of opinion is brought up, it's brought up by people that have absolutely no knowledge of how economics works. Financial system isn't perfect, I'll give you that, but there's a stretch between a broken system and the "illuminati" controlling the banks...

Financial Tyranny: I cannot believe _someone_ on HN would think that because some legislation makes the federal reserve a private corporation means that automatically it "controls" everyone and everything.

"Illuminati" is nothing but a fancy name for an organized crime - under an oath of secrecy, breaking of which means a death penalty. Why it is so difficult to understand that if organized crime groups are allowed to exploit and subvert the system for long periods of time, they will eventually succeed?

And what did you expect to learn on Wikipedia? You obviously have no idea how systemic and elaborate the suppression really is. I really suggest you go through the article I posted a link to, and actually read it.

(comment deleted)
I suppose Occam's Razor was invented by the establishment in a scheme to prevent us from thinking.
Neither of those links contain credible information, which is one reason you are receiving downvotes.

The book on Amazon was interesting. I clicked through and had a look at the reviews. Startlingly, it appeared to be rated exceptionally well, with an average of four and a half stars over two hundred votes.

The first comment on the page was a glowing review from someone who claimed to be an electrical engineer with an understanding of science.

Really?

The reviews on Amazon used to be good. Now, it's difficult to trust them. I don't think you can explain the Book rating solely through the scientifically illiterate nodding along.

Oh come on. Is this pseudoscience crap really appropriate on HN? Flagged.
Care to explain why?
The OP writes: "He was crucial in the development of radar, so he doesn’t seem to be a crackpot worthy of obscurity."

While the linked http://wikirota.org/en/Main_Page site claims that he was "a pioneer in the development of the radar", the Wikipedia article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_radar) doesn't even mention the name.

He does seem to be a crackpot worthy of obscurity.

I don't know if he was a "crackpot" or not, but your criteria (Wikipedia mention) is invalid. Wikipedia is neither complete, nor unbiased, nor objective, nor free of controversy.

As a first step in improving your criteria, look at the argumentum e contrario: Do you think there are no crackpots worthy of obscurity who have a Wikipedia entry?

You are right, of course, and I wasn't clear. Use Google, try to find any information on the guy or his theories outside of his fan wiki. If he was really "crucial in the development of radar", he can't be that obscure.

http://www.google.com/search?&q=%22Louis+Rota%22+radar

(comment deleted)
I would suggest searching in French. I would, but I don't speak French.
> He was crucial in the development of radar, so he doesn’t seem to be a crackpot worthy of obscurity

That's a huge assumption. Plenty of people start smart and end up total wing-nuts.

(comment deleted)
Just to be clear, that claim about the radar doesn't even true.
Rota's 1913 French patent application for this device can be found here: https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BwUohGCPTAlANTg5NTg2ODQtMzF...

It's in French of course, but it contains a fairly clear description of the device and its construction, although it doesn't mention the voltages needed. The implication from the text is that a DC voltage would be provided (it specifies the +ve and -ve plates).

It appears that it consists of a pair of capacitors (spaced charged plates) placed inside a magnetic field generated by some electromagnets (it looks like there are a total of 8 electromagnets around the capacitor). The whole thing is cased in a metal shielding.

So, it would seem quite buildable although there's no data on the size or voltages involved.

These obscure things always lack a theory. There are always some reports about a functioning device, but never the attempt from a physicist to explain them.

Is anyone here with enough understanding about the subject? Superconductor levitation exists for example, but there is also an explanation for it.