No assumption, just stating what it looks like and most probably is.
Drone is high and moving while focused on fixed point on ground, balloon drifts thru field of view in opposite direction and so looks faster than it really is. The geometry is visually deceptive though really quite simple.
How to explain the lack perspective change of ground features? Without it drone movement seems small, so hard to explain the giant speed in your balloon theory.
People don't understand that the vast majority of UFO behaviour is actually just the camera being unstable and jerking around a bit or a parallax effect caused by a moving and rotating camera pointing at a static object.
The famous "GIMBAL" UFO video on YouTube is just the backside of a jet and you are seeing the engine exhaust including glare.
> One of the slides that Kirkpatrick used in his testimony showed the geographic areas where UAP sightings happen the most, which coincided with locations around the world where there are known to be U.S. military installations.
Had a good chuckle at that one. I assume it was the journalist who added the ominous "coincides with military installations". You don't get sightings where you have no presence!
Actually that makes me want to play a round of UFO Enemy Unknown! Great game.
That’s a cool interpretation. Very creative. But I think you might be misinterpreting because apparently the Pentagon has dozens of similar videos and they all look like spheres and they’re all kind of navigating around that area. Also, if it’s a missile fuel tank wouldn’t have some thermal coming off it? but apparently there’s no thermal on most of these.
16 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 48.4 ms ] threadDrone is high and moving while focused on fixed point on ground, balloon drifts thru field of view in opposite direction and so looks faster than it really is. The geometry is visually deceptive though really quite simple.
The famous "GIMBAL" UFO video on YouTube is just the backside of a jet and you are seeing the engine exhaust including glare.
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/gimbal-ufo-a-new-analysis.1...
Without it drone movement seems small, so hard to explain the giant speed in your balloon or camera theory.
I guess it is explained by the "or a parallax effect caused by a moving and rotating camera pointing at a static object." part of GP post.
Had a good chuckle at that one. I assume it was the journalist who added the ominous "coincides with military installations". You don't get sightings where you have no presence!
Actually that makes me want to play a round of UFO Enemy Unknown! Great game.
Reaper drone spotted Aliens!
Reaper drone spots something, we don't know what.
We put a Terminator! in charge of a fighter jet.
We used some code as a fancy autopilot in a plane.
etc.
This doesn't reflect well on society or the media.