6 comments

[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 28.8 ms ] thread
MPL is missing from the list of copyleft licenses (particularly as an alternative to the LGPL for modern programming languages that static link single binary images).
Meh. I use BSD so I can continue developing and using the software I write when I move to a different company without the current company playing gpl / proprietary shinanigans, limiting my future freedom.

Calling me a cuck doesn't really do well for the argument "Developers who use GPL know how to effectively communicate with their peers."

what shenanigans? This reads like a kind of FUD. Once your software has been released under the GPL, you can continue developing it under the terms of the GPL.
If you have to resort to labeling and name calling to make your point, you've lost.
“Obscenities are symptoms of weak minds.” — Luke “Strong Mind” Smith