MPL is missing from the list of copyleft licenses (particularly as an alternative to the LGPL for modern programming languages that static link single binary images).
Meh. I use BSD so I can continue developing and using the software I write when I move to a different company without the current company playing gpl / proprietary shinanigans, limiting my future freedom.
Calling me a cuck doesn't really do well for the argument "Developers who use GPL know how to effectively communicate with their peers."
what shenanigans? This reads like a kind of FUD. Once your software has been released under the GPL, you can continue developing it under the terms of the GPL.
6 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 28.8 ms ] threadCalling me a cuck doesn't really do well for the argument "Developers who use GPL know how to effectively communicate with their peers."