That phrase and strategy seems to me to logically reduce as "To be more selfish, be more selfish." If so, we can ask more simply: is selfishness itself even deterministically self-interested in the end? That is to say, does selfishness fail to serve an individual human's highest well-being?
What was an insane idea then, is an insane idea now, too. Semiconductors hello. Democracy underdog next to homogeneity-driven monoculutre. Anyway, how am I supposed to read this? NYtimes has an annoying paywall and my CSS ninja magic seems like an unnecessary step to get to the matter
A dumb idea then, a monumentally stupid idea now. Taiwan represents the best of what the Chinese culture could become if they told the CCP to fuck off.
5 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 25.6 ms ] threadSorry I should probably have put the non-paywalled link in the submission