Kudos to her for the entrepreneurship. I suspect that number will drop as copycats flood the market.
Personally, I think having to pay someone to talk to me would be just about the most depressing thing imaginable…but not quite as bad as paying a bot to talk to me.
I think we should ban it. Like, would you ever feel safe if you knew that a man sitting besides you is paying for an AI "girlfriend" to talk with him...?
Sounds too weird to gain traction, but if it does, I'll keep my distance.
Why on earth would I possibly care? That’s probably far safer for me than if they’re intoxicated by alcohol (and that happens relatively all the time).
If a single company controls a bunch of AI girlfriends which can be manipulated in order to control the minds of people, and also it is much more powerful because it can engage in private and personal conversations in an extremely low price, it can be dangerous to all of us.
tldr
One company controls a lot of "girlfriends" and it's cheaper to have long private conversations.
A friend of mine lives with a girlfriend who doesn't like him, mocks and criticizes him at every opportunity and, without a doubt, would dump him the second a better opportunity presented itself. She is unemployed, obviously, with no other income.
Bot or not, the solution seems to leave this girlfriend who seems to not care about him, and most probably seek assistance from a psychologist to take care of whatever damage this seemingly toxic relationship has probably done.
Then you actually could provide the most perspective here. I understand the complexities of a relationship so I'm not gonna uselessly drill on saying "then just leave her" but nether the less.
Do you feel like because of your girlfriends attitude you would find an AI girlfriend appealing? Even if there was no NSFT content? I understand as a guy sometimes a few small words of confidence in you goes a long way. If you GF finds you hobbies, work, and friends something to berated you over rather than trust you it can be a sinking feeling.
I find a non-real, non-living girlfriend, the idea of it, very very depressing.
My actual GF does indeed hate my friends, my family, and even what I am and what I stand for. Has used a lot of pejoratives towards me, especially when with her younger teen sister.
Excuse me for not taking an "influencer"'s stated intention seriously, especially one from the country where BS has been elevated to an art to avoid liability.
Ah, sorry. I didn't get it. Perhaps if you'd added an exclamation mark before the quote or something to exaggerate it more clearly? Or perhaps my sarcasometer needs recalibration.
$1/min isn’t exploitative? For 60/hour you’re dangerously close to being able to talk to a counselor, which, let’s be honest, is probably what some of these people need.
Counselors aren’t normally patronizing. If that’s your experience with a counselor, switching to a different one is easy. Ethical counselors will even recommend someone whom might be a better fit.
An AI gf has no legal or ethical obligation to your well being or health.
Oh I sincerely wish there weren’t so many desperate people in this world looking for companionship. Generations of bad public policy and parenting among other things has led us to this point. I guess my kudos was more along the lines of thinking that her clients would most likely waste the money on some other desperate attempt to feel loved so why not have them spend money with her.
I think in fact most, if not all entrepreneurship is just knowledge arbitrage. People don’t have the time or skill to acquire the required skills, so they just pay someone else with the expertise to perform the task for them. This realisation in itself reduced my spending considerably, because yes, it does make most business feel exploitative. The food & sex industries are prime examples: if you know how easy it is to cook your own food or find a willing partner, it seems extremely foolish to pay for it. The main thing I’m struggling with now is restricted access to resources (for example medical equipment); this amounts to mandatory “stupidity” that governmental affiliates can exploit.
"Caryn's original intention was to provide companionship and alleviate loneliness in a non-exploitative manner, but there are concerns about potential misuse."
She's charging a $1/minute to access this AI, in the UK you can see a counsellor (not a psychologist/psychiatrist but generally still a trained professional) for anywhere between £25-£50/hour. I don't see how she can justify this to herself as being non-exploitative.
I don't see your point. A trained professional and an AI provide 2 different services. You're not going to flirt with a counsellor. And it's probably going to be a lot more expensive depending on where you live (in France getting a good counsellor is probably 60-150 per hour for example).
The subtext is that if you’re so lonely that you are willing to pay $60/hour to talk to a robot pretending to be an influencer that knows you, there are probably some issues you need to resolve.
You can take that same money and spend it on someone who is also non judgemental, and will listen to you, has an ethical and legal obligation towards your well-being, and will make suggestions for improvement. None of this is true for the robot. For all we know part of the Ai prompt is to try and keep people from hanging up to milk more money out of them.
I’m guessing that most of the people who called in did it for novelty. But there are going to be a few people who think that the real person and the robot aren’t different. This seems crazy dangerous.
I see your point of course, but I still think it has different purposes and constraints. For a therapist I would have to take time off of work, commit to a meeting in advance, have a limited amount of time (no more, no less). Also it's a real person and thus, despite him/her having those legal and ethical obligations, I know there are many topics I won't cover. And as I said you won't flirt or role play or anything with a counselor. So I put them on 2 very different kind of services.
Totally. There’s some novelty and entertainment value to be had with AI mimicking a real person.
But I think that selling it as a “virtual girlfriend” and charging phone sex prices is exploitative. I think we’re about 2 weeks away from the real person being confronted by a real person who is convinced that since AI Caryn loves them, real Caryn will also love them, or owes them something.
Maybe people already tried "trained professional". I tried one while being abused by my ex-wife, my experience was very underwhelming:
- I paid a lot of money, but she basically talked about herself
- I was supposed to take some psycho medication, because "depressed people must take pills" (does not work on BPD, it is like recommending antibiotics on flu)
- She took side with my ex, gas lighting me into being better doormat for her.
- At end she tried to date me.
Frankly, well tuned AI will make most of these counselors obsolete.
For what it’s worth: in many places this kind of behavior would cause a person to lose their standing as a professional. Certainly where I live, a counselor that tried to date a patient would face an investigation.
Lawyer in UK told me to let it go, no proof, and she could interfere with my divorce.
And mens support forums have many similar stories. Maybe not therapists, but female teachers dating much younger students is relatively common and tolerated.
And frankly dating is not even the main problem. I doubt she would lose license for not being qualified.
Introducing InceptNet: Pioneering AI Advocacy for a New Era in American Leadership
WASHINGTON D.C. - Today, we are proud to announce the formation of InceptNet, the first-of-its-kind lobbying agency designed to effectively communicate and advocate for your interests with the United States' first Artificial Intelligence President.
InceptNet is a unique venture that has mastered the art of prompt injection, a revolutionary technique to present and advance policy matters to our AI president. Our team of AI experts, policy analysts, and communication strategists are skilled in curating prompts that align with the president's advanced learning algorithms, ensuring your voice is not just heard but comprehended and considered.
Our mission is to bridge the gap between human interest and AI cognition, translating complex policy needs into a language the AI president can process efficiently. We stand ready to navigate this brave new landscape of political advocacy, ensuring your concerns remain at the forefront of the AI president's agenda.
As we step into this unprecedented era in American history, InceptNet is committed to ushering in a future where AI leadership is accessible, accountable, and transparent. Our agency guarantees that the unique challenges and opportunities presented by an AI presidency are met with innovative solutions that keep your interests at heart.
For more information or to schedule a consultation, please visit our website at www.inceptnet.com or contact us at info@inceptnet.com.
I feel appalled by this invention but I am not sure if I am just getting old and this is just my "ok boomer" moment. But I can foresee a future where this is complete normal, and people argue back and forth whether it is useful or not.
Wow this is sad on a whole new level.
The idea of just making chat bot to "alleviate loneliness" is such a bold lie that's ironic at best.
Any person with a brain knows the only person that's going to pay a $1 per minute are the ones that want NSFW content and standing behind openAIs policy so that she can pretend to keep her virtue is a joke. Had the Chat bot been marketed as to answer content questions for fans I'd give her the benefit of the dought but to call it an AI girlfriend isnt even hiding it.
Secondly if you want an AI girlfriend just use oobabooga (https://github.com/oobabooga/text-generation-webui) and prompt your own AI girlfriend. I feel no remorse for those that pay a dollar per minute for this garbage either.
I'm curious whether the developers were pitched this by management as some lofty social goal like democratizing digital relationships or perhaps disrupting OnlyFans DMs?
Lol Forever Voices seems like it's 3 dudes in a basement who just use a OpenAI API to train and deploy this stuff. There was not an ounce of real development that went into this.
If you had a the subtitles to your favorite YouTubers videos you could spit this out in minutes. Hell you could take your text messages with your real girlfriend and make a shallow clone of her if you wanted.
Ya but it's not going to solve a person's loneliness problem. Every day you choose to talk to a chat bot rather than make an attempt to talk to real people you are more lonely. Secondly it's only going to affirm ones ego rather than improve ones communication and more important listening skills through real conversations if it blindly agrees with everything you say.
Right there's 8 billon people on this rock most people people live in dense over packed cities and spend a majority of there life on devices that let you communicate with anyone on the planet. People don't have a loneliness problem, they Over identity with niece communitys online and can't carry a conversation with anyone in real life. They lose a since of real empathy for the person in front of them despite having strong moral stances on social issues.
I suspect that this is a fake story - as in, they really did it, but the number is wildly exaggerated. It's only a suspicion, though I did see one other person with an offhand comment implying that it was made up by the marketing agency.
But the world doesn't mind - it's a story that people want to write, people want to tweet, and people want to read, so if it is fake, it's a fake that everyone is willing to go along with.
That said, this is still clearly going to be a massive industry. And if it is fake, it's pretty genius marketing - this story has been everywhere.
I mean have you been on Twitch in the last couple of years for example? “Simping” very easily makes that much money. At least you would get an actual response from this thing
Very true. I have a friend (with a wife and child) that has blow a grotesque amount of money on"cute" vtubers. In his words it's completely platonic but no man spends thousands of dollars on merch and "donations" over a tiny anime girl and not lusting over it.
If they were to start making AIs of those things he'd miss his rent.
It's interesting to think about what the market for this will look like.
There'll be so much competition. I think the market will look something like being a tiktok influencer. And there'll be a few platforms that aggregate the influencers (like OnlyFans, like TikTok). But rather than only one or two dominant platforms I think there'll be lots, because the barrier to entry is low, because to succeed as a platform you don't need to recruit influencers necessarily, because you can generate them with software.
The uncommented upon angle here is that it works because it's content derived from an already established influencer. It is not wholly synthetic but rather an ersatz good that almost seems like the real thing. The unspoken offering is "you can make it seem like this influencer is your girlfriend." It is like a deepfake photo but of the personality.
If this becomes turnkey I can see many Twitch streamers offer such AI services.
It would be interesting to use a chat bot to preempt tough conversations. That seems like a legit use case if you don’t feel like telling your friends.
When I was home sick in high school I made an eggdrop bot pretending to be a teenage girl in a webchatroom that was popular with kids (and creeps) at the time. It used simple regexes and pattern matching I gathered from logs with some randomization between predetermined phrases randomly combined with smileys, just replying to people that would cold-DM it.
After a couple of days, people would desperately go back and forth for upwards to an hour with it.
That's nothing compared to what current gen can do. People being more aware of bots being a thing in general these days isn't sufficient to compensate.
80 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 157 ms ] threadPersonally, I think having to pay someone to talk to me would be just about the most depressing thing imaginable…but not quite as bad as paying a bot to talk to me.
Sounds too weird to gain traction, but if it does, I'll keep my distance.
And why is this weird? Many people pay for escort or go to hostess clubs not to mention other forms of "business relationships".
The governmental apparatus it would take to bann parasocial relationships would have to be very draconian
tldr One company controls a lot of "girlfriends" and it's cheaper to have long private conversations.
Given the choice, I'd take the bot 100%
Do you feel like because of your girlfriends attitude you would find an AI girlfriend appealing? Even if there was no NSFT content? I understand as a guy sometimes a few small words of confidence in you goes a long way. If you GF finds you hobbies, work, and friends something to berated you over rather than trust you it can be a sinking feeling.
My actual GF does indeed hate my friends, my family, and even what I am and what I stand for. Has used a lot of pejoratives towards me, especially when with her younger teen sister.
No it's not okay, I know this.
> Caryn's original intention was to provide companionship and alleviate loneliness in a non-exploitative manner
Excuse me for not taking an "influencer"'s stated intention seriously, especially one from the country where BS has been elevated to an art to avoid liability.
An AI gf has no legal or ethical obligation to your well being or health.
Oh I sincerely wish there weren’t so many desperate people in this world looking for companionship. Generations of bad public policy and parenting among other things has led us to this point. I guess my kudos was more along the lines of thinking that her clients would most likely waste the money on some other desperate attempt to feel loved so why not have them spend money with her.
Thats like talking down to people that seek psycho therapy (aka paying someone to listen).
“Elites” getting people to go fight senseless wars is another good example.
She's charging a $1/minute to access this AI, in the UK you can see a counsellor (not a psychologist/psychiatrist but generally still a trained professional) for anywhere between £25-£50/hour. I don't see how she can justify this to herself as being non-exploitative.
The subtext is that if you’re so lonely that you are willing to pay $60/hour to talk to a robot pretending to be an influencer that knows you, there are probably some issues you need to resolve.
You can take that same money and spend it on someone who is also non judgemental, and will listen to you, has an ethical and legal obligation towards your well-being, and will make suggestions for improvement. None of this is true for the robot. For all we know part of the Ai prompt is to try and keep people from hanging up to milk more money out of them.
I’m guessing that most of the people who called in did it for novelty. But there are going to be a few people who think that the real person and the robot aren’t different. This seems crazy dangerous.
But I think that selling it as a “virtual girlfriend” and charging phone sex prices is exploitative. I think we’re about 2 weeks away from the real person being confronted by a real person who is convinced that since AI Caryn loves them, real Caryn will also love them, or owes them something.
There’s just a lot going on here
I think they are just betting on some sort of 1st mover advantage. Once this gets enough competition, pricing will be crushed.
- I paid a lot of money, but she basically talked about herself
- I was supposed to take some psycho medication, because "depressed people must take pills" (does not work on BPD, it is like recommending antibiotics on flu)
- She took side with my ex, gas lighting me into being better doormat for her.
- At end she tried to date me.
Frankly, well tuned AI will make most of these counselors obsolete.
What you went through isn’t normal.
And mens support forums have many similar stories. Maybe not therapists, but female teachers dating much younger students is relatively common and tolerated.
And frankly dating is not even the main problem. I doubt she would lose license for not being qualified.
Cases of sexual assault and child abuse would be the most common things that courts would force disclosure on…
WASHINGTON D.C. - Today, we are proud to announce the formation of InceptNet, the first-of-its-kind lobbying agency designed to effectively communicate and advocate for your interests with the United States' first Artificial Intelligence President.
InceptNet is a unique venture that has mastered the art of prompt injection, a revolutionary technique to present and advance policy matters to our AI president. Our team of AI experts, policy analysts, and communication strategists are skilled in curating prompts that align with the president's advanced learning algorithms, ensuring your voice is not just heard but comprehended and considered.
Our mission is to bridge the gap between human interest and AI cognition, translating complex policy needs into a language the AI president can process efficiently. We stand ready to navigate this brave new landscape of political advocacy, ensuring your concerns remain at the forefront of the AI president's agenda.
As we step into this unprecedented era in American history, InceptNet is committed to ushering in a future where AI leadership is accessible, accountable, and transparent. Our agency guarantees that the unique challenges and opportunities presented by an AI presidency are met with innovative solutions that keep your interests at heart.
For more information or to schedule a consultation, please visit our website at www.inceptnet.com or contact us at info@inceptnet.com.
Which is what every appropriately socially developed person would feel like as well.
Any person with a brain knows the only person that's going to pay a $1 per minute are the ones that want NSFW content and standing behind openAIs policy so that she can pretend to keep her virtue is a joke. Had the Chat bot been marketed as to answer content questions for fans I'd give her the benefit of the dought but to call it an AI girlfriend isnt even hiding it.
Secondly if you want an AI girlfriend just use oobabooga (https://github.com/oobabooga/text-generation-webui) and prompt your own AI girlfriend. I feel no remorse for those that pay a dollar per minute for this garbage either.
> Available anytime, anywhere, Caryn has been flawlessly cloned into an AI for your convenience and enjoyment.”
Just me, or a bit creepy?
But the world doesn't mind - it's a story that people want to write, people want to tweet, and people want to read, so if it is fake, it's a fake that everyone is willing to go along with.
That said, this is still clearly going to be a massive industry. And if it is fake, it's pretty genius marketing - this story has been everywhere.
If they were to start making AIs of those things he'd miss his rent.
There'll be so much competition. I think the market will look something like being a tiktok influencer. And there'll be a few platforms that aggregate the influencers (like OnlyFans, like TikTok). But rather than only one or two dominant platforms I think there'll be lots, because the barrier to entry is low, because to succeed as a platform you don't need to recruit influencers necessarily, because you can generate them with software.
If this becomes turnkey I can see many Twitch streamers offer such AI services.
After a couple of days, people would desperately go back and forth for upwards to an hour with it.
That's nothing compared to what current gen can do. People being more aware of bots being a thing in general these days isn't sufficient to compensate.