Ask HN: Language for Rules Engine · shard-db HN Explorer

kls 14y ago ↗

There is no standard, but what technologies are you planning on using? Personally I would consider using one of the Lisp dialects because they are so easy at writing DSL's you can even write it so that you have a simple DSL that can drop back to full Lisp as people grow in their ability to write rules. What platform are you targeting, if you are targeting the JVM then Clojure would be a good choice, if it is the .net platform then you may have to look at IronScheme are another variant, but they are not as well supported as Clojure. If you have a very specific platform then you could look at using Common Lisp.

The reason I would chose a Lisp is due to the ability to rapidly write a DSL, so you can build a tailored language for the rules engine further you can rapidly build variants for industry specific verticals, that conform to the jargon of that industry.

My secondary choices would be many of the scripting languages with JavaScript being the top second choice. JavaScript is a good candidate because it is simple to pick up and has a lot of material geared towards the non-programmer.

For me personally I would shy away from any languadge that enforces OO, not because I think OO is bad, I am actually a proponent of OO for certain cases, but rather because OO brings a lot of baggage with it that creates barriers for individuals that are not programming as a primary job role.

Finally, the idea of Rules engines have been great on paper, the promise of turning the power of decision trees over to business annalist but the reality has not been so favorably to rules engines. Most of the time the responsibility of actually writing the rules is pushed right back to the programmer. So the big thing you have to ask yourself is how is my idea different. I am not trying to be the rotten apple in your pie. I just want to highlight that the promise of rules engines has thus far been marred with failure. Which tells me that more people need to innovate in that space. I would just advise you to really question how you are going to deal with that reality. I think utilizing a Lisp is one of the keys to a proper DSL strategy and I think the lack of good DSL's is where rules engines have failed, hence my recommendation.

bpyne 14y ago ↗

First off, thank you for the well thought out response.

I was far too vague with my question. I did not mean a general purpose rules engine as in the middleware piece. What I'm thinking about is better described as a rules based system, but far more complex than anything I've written in the past. Just to add complexity, a few domain experts will have the ability to modify and implement rules.

My inclination is towards a language with a small syntactic footprint and not a lot of tribute towards system stuff like memory management. So I was leaning towards Clojure but JS is a great thought. Other languages I wondered about were Prolog and Scala.

I'm doing it as a learning exercise, an attempt at keeping my skills from rusting, and because my day job is boring. If it can be monetized, that's a bonus.

dromey 14y ago ↗

Prolog and other logic programming languages are natural rule languages. You will want to consider the semantics that the rules are given as well as how negation in the language is treated. It's also good to know the (worst-case) complexity of the problems you are trying to solve and to match them appropriately to expressive power of the rule language you propose to use.

[deleted] 14y ago ↗

(comment deleted)

dangrossman 14y ago ↗

Not that many years ago I worked at a company that had implemented a rules engine for documenting the health and safety information associated with their products, based on rules operating on the chemical formula of the product, with CLIPS [1]. The rules were dynamic. You define the rules and program it in a LISP-like language. It was embedded in a C++ program that generated and fed the rules to CLIPS.

http://clipsrules.sourceforge.net/