3 comments

[ 4.9 ms ] story [ 21.3 ms ] thread
>with no regard to the ownership rights of those who created human knowledge over millennia

This is a side of AI issue I haven't seen discussed much here.

It used to be called culture now it's called IP. Is that too edgy to say, I feel like it might be too edgy. Maybe the difference between culture and IP is if you have physical forces like police to enforce how it's used. So maybe like wearing toga is culture but dyeing the toga purple if you aren't the emperor violates IP.
This bulldata is infuriating.

“Ownership” of knowledge is a farce created by modern opportunists.

All throughout human history every generation has had the right to assimilate and rewrite what has come before.

From science to art (literary tradition!)

Where would Milton, Dante, Virgil, even Homer have been without appropriation. Nothing!

The Romans appropriated the Greeks for f’s sakes.

This conception is a hypocrisy built upon modern miscomprehension, or further exploitive opportunism of an elite few controlling modern IP rights.