6 comments

[ 0.19 ms ] story [ 24.8 ms ] thread
Taking Twitter out of a EU bureaucracy enforced censorship scheme, where they decide what's OK to publish and what's disinformation?

And that in today's political climate where e.g. in France if you swear against Macron you can be prosecuted [1] (or even arrested when at London [2]), or e.g. having a different opinion on covid measures labelled you an "anti-vaxxer that spreads disinformation" (when a little later the heads of EU where investigated for taking bribes from pharmaceutical companies) [3]?

Oh, the humanity!

[1] https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20230329-french-woman-...

[2] https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/19/french-publi...

[3] https://www.politico.eu/article/covid19-european-commission-...

These things have nothing to do with the DSA.

Sure, mistakes were done during the COVID-19 pandemic, as could be expected in any serious crisis, there are corrupt politicians, and I agree that some questionable things are going on in France. Though, I doubt these hold in courts; they already backed out from the planned restrictions on the freedom of assembly. I urge you to take a look at what is happening in the Brexit land at this front.

>These things have nothing to do with the DSA.

Yeah, only with the political climate the DSA will be enforced in...

>Though, I doubt these hold in courts;

Doesn't matter as they can still be used by the police to harass and intimidate people. Getting arrested or just facing a legal battle and having to go through it is intimidating in itself, even if you end up winning the case.

(And such fines have held in court before)

(comment deleted)
Participation in regulatory "regimes" isn't just a ball and chain that weighs down a company, it's also a shield that protects them from legal liability.