[–] supermatt 3y ago ↗ FUD. ALL the regulatory activity mentioned in the article is related to "high-risk" AI systems, which are specifically:- where the AI is part of a safety system, and where that safety system already needs to undergo conformity assessment.OR- where the AI system poses a significant risk of harm to the health, safety or fundamental rights of natural persons - for very specific use-cases (page 122-125 https://www.europarl.europa.eu/resources/library/media/20230...). [–] anthk 3y ago ↗ So, the same as before. ADA/Spark and that subset of secure C were already made into libre standards for security and correctness in dangerous env with high constraints.
[–] anthk 3y ago ↗ So, the same as before. ADA/Spark and that subset of secure C were already made into libre standards for security and correctness in dangerous env with high constraints.
[–] srg0 3y ago ↗ I think it's important to understand what kind of AI systems this regulation is talking about (high-risk AI systems).Title III Chapter 1 CLASSIFICATION OF AI SYSTEMS AS HIGH-RISK[AI systems shall be considered high-risk if they pose]- a significant risk of harm to the health, safety or fundamental rights of natural persons- a significant risk of harm to the environmentAlso Annex III page 122[use cases considered to be high-risk]1. Biometric and biometrics-based systems2. Management and operation of critical infrastructure3. Education and vocational training4. Employment, workers management and access to self-employment5. Access to and enjoyment of essential private services and public services and benefits6. Law enforcement7. Migration, asylum and border control management8. Administration of justice and democratic processesIf an AI system affects people and their rights, or national security, or environment, it is subject to regulation. Fair enough.[1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/plmrep/COM...
5 comments
[ 2.0 ms ] story [ 24.0 ms ] thread- where the AI is part of a safety system, and where that safety system already needs to undergo conformity assessment.
OR
- where the AI system poses a significant risk of harm to the health, safety or fundamental rights of natural persons - for very specific use-cases (page 122-125 https://www.europarl.europa.eu/resources/library/media/20230...).
Title III Chapter 1 CLASSIFICATION OF AI SYSTEMS AS HIGH-RISK
[AI systems shall be considered high-risk if they pose]
- a significant risk of harm to the health, safety or fundamental rights of natural persons
- a significant risk of harm to the environment
Also Annex III page 122
[use cases considered to be high-risk]
1. Biometric and biometrics-based systems
2. Management and operation of critical infrastructure
3. Education and vocational training
4. Employment, workers management and access to self-employment
5. Access to and enjoyment of essential private services and public services and benefits
6. Law enforcement
7. Migration, asylum and border control management
8. Administration of justice and democratic processes
If an AI system affects people and their rights, or national security, or environment, it is subject to regulation. Fair enough.
[1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/plmrep/COM...