I missed four and I half-guessed on three questions, though I was able to rule out many impossible answers even on those. I saw two lucky guesses and three brain farts, so it mostly evened out. Without the silly mistakes I could have improved my score to 49/50.
Being able to recite at least the first ten or so elements from memory is rather useful on this quiz. And that last question is a bit out of place, being more of a history question than one of science. Sure, I got it right because I knew it had to be a trap, but even so.
I'm afraid the first question was a general-knowledge question, which led me (perhaps unfairly?) to write the rest of the test off as nothing more than a specialised knowledge quiz.
I don't suppose it went into scientific method, controlled experiments, philosophy of science, etc.?
If not, then it could hardly be called a scientific literacy quiz, any more than a random series of questions about specific APIs is a programming interview.
11 comments
[ 4.8 ms ] story [ 20.1 ms ] threadBeing able to recite at least the first ten or so elements from memory is rather useful on this quiz. And that last question is a bit out of place, being more of a history question than one of science. Sure, I got it right because I knew it had to be a trap, but even so.
I don't suppose it went into scientific method, controlled experiments, philosophy of science, etc.?
If not, then it could hardly be called a scientific literacy quiz, any more than a random series of questions about specific APIs is a programming interview.
I'm going to go install an extension that blocks those.