On the contrary, it is more free than macOS or Windows if I value my time.
Because nobody else can fix the time and quality to answer support questions.
Within Linux there is also the Windows-like subsection of Ubuntu (a huge timesink), compared to the unix-like subsections of arch or fedora/redhat.
I have the opposite experience. I spend less time managing and fixing computers of people that upgraded to GNU/Linux. It just runs more stable and does not clog up over time needing a reinstall to actually get it back to normal. Also if something goes wrong it is much easier to diagnose and fix problems remotely with GNU/Linux. So yeah GNU/Linux is also much closer to free when it comes to time needed to keep it running.
I have spent far too much time trying and failing to get Linux to sync its clock from the internet, out of a stubborn refusal to accept defeat, for me to entertain the thought that it's usable to the average person.
7 comments
[ 4.1 ms ] story [ 11.9 ms ] threadAnd it's as true today as it was then
Within Linux there is also the Windows-like subsection of Ubuntu (a huge timesink), compared to the unix-like subsections of arch or fedora/redhat.
MacOS is a mostly closed source, expensive, user-condescending walled garden.
Linux, BSDs, and free / open source operating systems give the user freedom and control over their computing experience:
https://youtu.be/Ag1AKIl_2GM?t=57
He is mocking the phrase, not agreeing with it.