Hydraulic warfare is here to stay. NATO should plan for it (defensenews.com) 5 points by jspencer508 3y ago ↗ HN
[–] zgluck 3y ago ↗ Sure, but that's a weird name. There must be a better name for this kind of warfare - how about "flood warfare"? [–] jprd 3y ago ↗ Agreed. I just imagined a bunch of really slow catapults or people using Super Soakers when I saw the title.Also. F. That.War is terrible, it is so terrible we created _rules_ for it."I will do anything to kill your people, but I won't do that. No I won't do that." [–] [deleted] 3y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
[–] jprd 3y ago ↗ Agreed. I just imagined a bunch of really slow catapults or people using Super Soakers when I saw the title.Also. F. That.War is terrible, it is so terrible we created _rules_ for it."I will do anything to kill your people, but I won't do that. No I won't do that." [–] [deleted] 3y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
3 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 18.1 ms ] threadAlso. F. That.
War is terrible, it is so terrible we created _rules_ for it.
"I will do anything to kill your people, but I won't do that. No I won't do that."