Tell HN: In my entire life, I have never enjoyed a scrolljacking website
Not once.
I don't care how hard you worked on it, I don't care how many web technologies you abused to get it working, I don't care how many hits or views or conversions or whatchamacallits it got for you.
If I visit your website and I see a scrolljacking, window-breaking, bandwidth hogging accessibility nightmare, I'm either going to force it to open in Safari Reader or leave entirely.
No content is worth this crap.
12 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 42.5 ms ] threadIt’s shown to management, everybody oohs and aahs at the clever transitions between slides… And then the developer is stuck trying to replicate that “unique experience” with the designer breathing down their neck.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2t1vfur07xE&pp=ygUMd2hvb29vIGN...
Is OP really still talking about scrolljacking with so much vehement in 2023?
yawn
Tbh, I haven’t even seen a site that scrolljacks in years. I definitely haven’t cared in years.
Also, this is what the HN guidelines say about this:
> Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting.
My goto response is: mentally blacklist the site and its products/services. They don't seem to notice, though. (-;
Regarding "tangential annoyances": if the article's topic is "foo", and somebody complains about the article using Geneva instead of Helvetica, I'd call that tangential; but if the topic is "too many sites are doing annoying thing 'baz'!", then I'd not call than tangential.
What site really prompted this Tell HN rant?