Zuckerberg only had one job with Threads, and he blew it (fastcompany.com) 16 points by sizzle 3y ago ↗ HN
[–] meepmorp 3y ago ↗ "It's not Twitter, so it's a failure." [–] hidelooktropic 3y ago ↗ Of course that's oversimplified but feature parity to a degree matters if you're wanting users to adopt your copycat product. [–] nonstopdev 3y ago ↗ If the hype of it being a “Twitter killer”, doesn’t it need to provide the features of Twitter minus Elon?Wasn’t that the whole point of all these new apps?
[–] hidelooktropic 3y ago ↗ Of course that's oversimplified but feature parity to a degree matters if you're wanting users to adopt your copycat product.
[–] nonstopdev 3y ago ↗ If the hype of it being a “Twitter killer”, doesn’t it need to provide the features of Twitter minus Elon?Wasn’t that the whole point of all these new apps?
[–] MattGaiser 3y ago ↗ I imagine that one must balance this with seizing the moment.There is a strong desire for a Twitter alternative as things stand and Musk did Threads a favour by forcing people off Twitter with rate limits.
5 comments
[ 3.7 ms ] story [ 30.1 ms ] threadWasn’t that the whole point of all these new apps?
There is a strong desire for a Twitter alternative as things stand and Musk did Threads a favour by forcing people off Twitter with rate limits.