33 comments

[ 1.00 ms ] story [ 107 ms ] thread
It's definitely worth concern but don't fall for the doomsday hype - this is the degradation of plastics. Probably nothing insidious.

USGS writeup: https://www.usgs.gov/news/national-news-release/tap-water-st...

The study itself: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016041202...

Map showing the regions with PFAS detected in tap water: https://d9-wret.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets/palladium/...

PFAS is a serious concern however and is present.
True. It's a heavy concern as well since we seldom have any idea how to detect let alone getting rid of it.
Recent discussions:

Nearly half of the tap water in the US is contaminated with ‘forever chemicals

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36616841 (148 comments)

3M reaches $10.3B settlement over PFAS contamination of water systems

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36660751 (317 comments)

Ok what’s the solution? Does simple filters like Brita work?
Reverse osmosis.
The only problem is that also needed things are removed from the water. Like natrium and other things.
Are they needed more than PFAS?
Natrium and other substances of mineralic origin are required for the human body. Dinking water withoit them is an effective way to destroy vital organs, since the water will pull it from your cells via osmosis.
since you would die of organ failure withput them: yes you need them.
Reverse osmosis wastes so much water though
Drink PFAS, I'm not sure how to help!
They're also found in things like vegetables and meat and fish.
(comment deleted)
[flagged]
What metals were they poisoned by?
In Flint it was mostly because of lead poisoning, that was caused by the city pumping chemicals in the pipes that removed the protective layer. Another source was contaminated water from the flint river.
Is it really a race thing or are you just hoisting a maladaptive framework on to a situation to further a tangential viewpoint?

There are white people in Flint too and I’m sure there are white people in Durango too. Having white people in an area isn’t some sort of talisman to ward off greed, incompetence, or social injustice.

I agree with your statement that it really sucks and it is not right or just or fair or acceptable but your last line is like lobbing a stink bomb in a waiting area and leaving.

That said, if you have proof that the area was contaminated because of the fact there are no rich white people in the area then you can make this comment and I will be wrong.

I think there are other frameworks that explain these situations like it’s an impoverished area, the company had misaligned incentives, people didn’t realize the lasting impact, and or just a general lack of competence and foresight.

I find these little race throwaway hand grenade comments truly only serve to keep people at each other’s throats and distracts them from the true nature of the issue, class warfare and psychological manipulation to serve as a distraction.

I’m not a rich white person nor paid by the rich white lobby.

The 'rich white people' shorthand typical serves as an obvious stand in for 'those who have the political autonomy and systemic support to fight against harmful government and corporate actions'.

The vast majority of readers can quickly make the connection between 'politically powerful' and 'rich white people' assuming they live in America. It's not on random HN commenters to be egalitarian humanities writers who deconstruct every concept

>The vast majority of readers can quickly make the connection between 'politically powerful' and 'rich white people' assuming they live in America.

Sounds like intentional racism to me. If you want to say the rich and powerful why wouldn't you just say that instead of committing to racist comments?

The US has a long, long history of racism. It's not racist to point that out.
Saying white when you mean "rich and powerful" is intentional racism.
It also happens to be pretty factual. There are somewhere in the neighborhood of 700 billionaires in the US. Take a guess how many of them are black.
> The vast majority of readers can quickly make the connection between 'politically powerful' and 'rich white people' assuming they live in America. It's not on random HN commenters to be egalitarian humanities writers who deconstruct every concept

They shouldn't have to make such a connection, because such sloppy racism is not in keeping with the tone of this forum, nor with any international audience.

Also it's crazy ignorant. Durango is filled with white people, all the way from poor to god level rich (their tiny town aquarium has nurse sharks in the back for the mansions around there).
Mmm guessing that I missed the train on this 'un, but in case someone stumbles upon this and is concerned aboot the FX of PFAS, besides water filtration – and I recommend this because it is literally impossible to avoid them unless your dietary sources are locally sourced (and you know they aren't fed/hydrated with PFAS ridden feed/water) – CoQ10 is, thus far, the singular supplement/medicine jawn I know of to aid your body's removal of the endogenous activating particles.

Realizing I should provide some source as I'm no expert. I don't think this is the original paper I stumbled upon, but I imagine it says much of the same...

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367212337_The_antio...