Posters on “Anonymous” Online Economics Forum identified due to poor hashing (twitter.com) 4 points by dalek2point3 2y ago ↗ HN
[–] ok123456 2y ago ↗ The methodology is very flawed. If anything, he's invented a new proof of work coin. Guess the hash function and it's inputs such that there collisions in the ranges you'd expect. [–] 3cats-in-a-coat 2y ago ↗ Can we please not cringe everything into coin & blockchain talk. [–] ok123456 2y ago ↗ 1) The research is cringe. 2) it's appropriate because he's literally guessing hashes. [–] 3cats-in-a-coat 2y ago ↗ Sure, but I visibly wince when I read "coin" these days. Please excuse me. [–] ok123456 2y ago ↗ That's a you problem.
[–] 3cats-in-a-coat 2y ago ↗ Can we please not cringe everything into coin & blockchain talk. [–] ok123456 2y ago ↗ 1) The research is cringe. 2) it's appropriate because he's literally guessing hashes. [–] 3cats-in-a-coat 2y ago ↗ Sure, but I visibly wince when I read "coin" these days. Please excuse me. [–] ok123456 2y ago ↗ That's a you problem.
[–] ok123456 2y ago ↗ 1) The research is cringe. 2) it's appropriate because he's literally guessing hashes. [–] 3cats-in-a-coat 2y ago ↗ Sure, but I visibly wince when I read "coin" these days. Please excuse me. [–] ok123456 2y ago ↗ That's a you problem.
[–] 3cats-in-a-coat 2y ago ↗ Sure, but I visibly wince when I read "coin" these days. Please excuse me. [–] ok123456 2y ago ↗ That's a you problem.
5 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 27.7 ms ] thread