11 comments

[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 34.7 ms ] thread
If he is making a financial management app he should call it "Fritter".
Nah, I like Xter better.
He started with the "How hard can a simple website like twitter be?" mistake when he fired everyone. Now he's chasing it with some nice scope creep. Making an "everything" app could take time away from shitposting/Tesla/spaceX/10 kids.
For reasons you already stated, he'll likely not ship anything serious, except more logo changes and various poorly cooked reasons to ask for more money.

As a brand, "X" is an absolute disaster. People & media will always call it "X, formerly Twitter" so it's clear what it refers to. When you search for "X" in Google it shows bunch of things about X-Rays, an A24 slasher movie, the letter of the alphabet, and nothing about Twitter's X. While it may get better in time, it won't be by much.

> People & media will always call it "X, formerly Twitter"

It could end up normalizing to something like "X app" which itself could eventually be pronounced as "zap".

Possible, if it actually succeeds in ending up everywhere and ubiquitous.

If not, as things are going, media would rather go for more SEO friendly combos like "X formerly Twitter", "Elon Musk's X app", or when things visibly go further downhill "the troubled X app", "the beleaguered X app"...

When you become "beleaguered" in media, it's truly over.

"It’s not just a name change"

He's selling vaporware again. So far, "X" is just a name change, and a very incomplete one, at that. And it's a terrible name unsearchable in Google, and protected by thousands of existing trademark registrations of brands consisting of X or containing X.

The fact no one stopped him in doing this means Twitter won't get better. The only path is down.

It's not "just a name change."

There's also a logo.

Yeah. A rebrand should accompany new features. This is doing the easy part first in the laziest way possible.