Reasons to be skeptical of that room-temperature superconductor claim (twitter.com) 11 points by gautamcgoel 2y ago ↗ HN
[–] gct 2y ago ↗ > I am not a real expert in superconductivity, but I am a guy on the internet with opinions, so here we go with some early reactions:Alrighty then. [–] spekcular 2y ago ↗ The author is a professor at Ohio State University, specializing in condensed matter theory. His CV list two works on superconductors and a dissertation on supercapacitors. [–] 3cats-in-a-coat 2y ago ↗ Assistant professor, but yes. He's not exactly just a "guy with an opinion".
[–] spekcular 2y ago ↗ The author is a professor at Ohio State University, specializing in condensed matter theory. His CV list two works on superconductors and a dissertation on supercapacitors. [–] 3cats-in-a-coat 2y ago ↗ Assistant professor, but yes. He's not exactly just a "guy with an opinion".
[–] 3cats-in-a-coat 2y ago ↗ Assistant professor, but yes. He's not exactly just a "guy with an opinion".
[–] gus_massa 2y ago ↗ I'm not logged in and I only see the first tweet (x?), but I guess it's a chain. Is there some way to see all of them? [–] weissbier 2y ago ↗ I usually resort to nitter.net.https://nitter.net/gravity_levity/status/1684029657857892354
[–] weissbier 2y ago ↗ I usually resort to nitter.net.https://nitter.net/gravity_levity/status/1684029657857892354
[–] roomey 2y ago ↗ He says they don't describe a critical temp where resistance appears, but I think they do int their paper 127°C
6 comments
[ 4.3 ms ] story [ 21.1 ms ] threadAlrighty then.
https://nitter.net/gravity_levity/status/1684029657857892354