I get being mad when a service is down, but some people seem to be like, melting down. Humans have lived for millenia (and really into the what, mid 2000s) without doorbell cameras, but some of those people are acting like they're going to get murdered now that it's down.
"I actually feel very vulnerable not being able to check my cameras before I go to bed"
"I am missing many moments at home now !!"
"I have no clue if someone is breaking in now"
"The one time we decide to put the puppy downstairs on his own, we can’t even make sure he’s ok. Never mind our doorbell picking up people who have no business being there"
"Would have been great to at least have a view of the robbers if they came to my house, u know. What a 'Ring' is supposed to be used for."
Do ya think? I'm suprised and saddened by these reactions.
I kind of dig when things go down, I sort of like sitting around the gas fireplace and listening to my ham radio in a dark house for a few hours. If shit really hits the fan then it’s time for the tabletop gas burner and some beef and shrimp with veggies.
24/7 news cycle constantly highlighting every single kidnapping or crime that happens across the country has instilled a culture of fear in most people.
I grew up riding my bike completely across town by myself, before cell phones were pervasive. Parents these days are afraid of letting their kid walk 5 minutes to the neighborhood park…
People are losing their minds. This person sounds like many software developers: " I’m debating on setting up a home DVR system because I can’t trust Ring will stay online 24/7." - good luck with that.
I mean, I get the frustration but you outsourced a core service to the internet, then are shocked when it's not available all the time? All the comments about "must be 24/7" and "don't you have backups?" etc... How can we possibly expect people to consider subtle things like privacy when they don't get the fundamentals?
"They" and "people" includes a surprising fraction of software engineers themselves. So many engineers design their systems assuming every customer has internet 24/7.
And what are the odds that they’ve never experienced an outage while on the job? Shit happens, I stopped freaking out about outages after I started my software career because every time one happens, my first thought is “I’m just glad it’s not me dealing with it”
If this was the 90s and a telephone pole crash took down an alarm system monitoring center nobody would bat an eyelash. It’s inconvenient, but it happens.
The digital equivalent—dropping the prod DB or something—draws the ire of millions. Consumer expectations changed when we put a computer in their pocket screaming OUTAGE.
They wouldn't expect any redundancy in an alarm system monitoring centre? Also there's a very brief instance in time where such a system would not be basically digital.
I think a lot of systems have lost a lot of reliability and resilience as they are replaced by (centralized, virtual) digital equivalents.
Having a doorbell that fails because someone made a typo in a DNS entry (or whatever it is this time) is silly and people have every right to be angry. Though it would help if they direct some of that anger towards themselves for subjecting themselves to a doorbell that they don't control and sends surveillance on its immediate surrounding to some third party (who may send it back, for a price).
That's an interesting observation, but I don't think it's because of the instant-outage-notification thing.
It might be worthwhile to look at how peoples' expectations of service availability have changed in the last fifty years as compared to peoples' perceived importance of non-essential services.
Having a replica is an easy part - just host another DVR elsewhere (in a location you own or trust, preferably far away) and stream a copy there at the same time you're streaming a copy to your local DVR. Repeat with more replicas (or a distributed filesystem with relevant properties) for higher resiliency. There are a bunch of distributed filesystem solutions out there to pick from. If you have a hacked but original firmware, most likely it uses a variant of S3 protocol for their cloud recordings, so simple binary patching (replacing hostnames and any hardcoded TLS certificates or fingerprints) may do the trick.
Having a backup power and network is tricky. You need a reliable battery backup that would automatically kick in in case of power outage, notify you about the failure and power all systems that must stay online for a reasonable amount of time. And an one or more alternate network links that would still work if the primary one is severed - e.g. a fiber line and a 5G modem, but the more the merrier.
Insecure firmware is probably not a problem if all devices are strictly isolated away to their own VLAN, which is carefully firewalled away from all your other systems (so even if you get a compromised laptop on your home LAN, it can't reach those cameras without going through a tightly locked down jumphost). Then it is more likely someone's throwing a wrench to a camera than someone hacking into it (even if all it takes is passwordless telnet that gives root access).
This can be done relatively pain-free with Ubiquiti with the added benefit of getting the full framerate recorded all the time instead of only during a detection.
It’s more expensive, but all recordings are local.
The best side effect of only-record-with-motion is that I have multiple cameras running on full solar. Running power would have been quite inconvenient.
However, any time I try to view a feed and it lags or doesn’t connect, I swear I’m just gonna hard wire everything. Sometimes it’s nice to have one system I can’t tinker with.
Or just take a walk in a Ringed-up neighborhood with the knowledge that your pictures are not being sent to the local police department in the name of 'pre-crime'.
I never thought about it before but these things are all wifi based right. What happens when you show up with your 2.4GHz jammer in the kilowatt range that you uhhh, liberated from a common cooking appliance.
I mean besides making all the hams in the neighborhood mad at you.
I have digital locks on my front and back door, but they have no external connectivity (something I specifically looked for). No wifi, no bluetooth.
So far the only failure mode has been the battery running out, but it gives you plenty of warning. And if you're super lazy like me, you just go in the other door when the battery runs out. :)
Even though we have MyQ and have integrated it into Alexa (and was part of the Resideo system we got when we bought the house), my wife and I still use the old school remotes in our car, and we have keypad access as well (which is the same technology Liftmaster has used for 20+ years)
This is why I went with HomeKit devices only where possible.
The door lock is HomeKit and does Bluetooth so it works when the power is out and internet is down, has a key and PIN code for backup.
Garage door opener requires the WiFi to be up, but it will work without internet if you’re close enough to connect to home WiFi.
HomeKit is far from perfect but I like that it doesn’t require internet for the core functions to work. Thread and Matter devices have made it even better.
57 comments
[ 4.7 ms ] story [ 146 ms ] threadI'm willing to bet a lot of that anger comes from them feeling afraid. It's marketing in action.
"I am missing many moments at home now !!"
"I have no clue if someone is breaking in now"
"The one time we decide to put the puppy downstairs on his own, we can’t even make sure he’s ok. Never mind our doorbell picking up people who have no business being there"
"Would have been great to at least have a view of the robbers if they came to my house, u know. What a 'Ring' is supposed to be used for."
Do ya think? I'm suprised and saddened by these reactions.
Ring's marketing is one of the many things that are contributing to the increasing isolation and alienation of people from each other.
It's got understated irony that somehow tends to sarcasm at the same time. It's very hard to unpack yet delicious.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newspeak
Jira can wait until the power comes back on.
I grew up riding my bike completely across town by myself, before cell phones were pervasive. Parents these days are afraid of letting their kid walk 5 minutes to the neighborhood park…
I mean, I get the frustration but you outsourced a core service to the internet, then are shocked when it's not available all the time? All the comments about "must be 24/7" and "don't you have backups?" etc... How can we possibly expect people to consider subtle things like privacy when they don't get the fundamentals?
The digital equivalent—dropping the prod DB or something—draws the ire of millions. Consumer expectations changed when we put a computer in their pocket screaming OUTAGE.
I think a lot of systems have lost a lot of reliability and resilience as they are replaced by (centralized, virtual) digital equivalents.
Having a doorbell that fails because someone made a typo in a DNS entry (or whatever it is this time) is silly and people have every right to be angry. Though it would help if they direct some of that anger towards themselves for subjecting themselves to a doorbell that they don't control and sends surveillance on its immediate surrounding to some third party (who may send it back, for a price).
It might be worthwhile to look at how peoples' expectations of service availability have changed in the last fifty years as compared to peoples' perceived importance of non-essential services.
Part of the struggle is… what happens during a break in and they just swipe the damn dvr.
I’m torn.
Mine is also one that to enable RTSP means it running a insecure firmware. So I can’t use both services. It’s rtsp or cloud only.
forget the combination to be invulnerable to rubberhose crypto
Having a backup power and network is tricky. You need a reliable battery backup that would automatically kick in in case of power outage, notify you about the failure and power all systems that must stay online for a reasonable amount of time. And an one or more alternate network links that would still work if the primary one is severed - e.g. a fiber line and a 5G modem, but the more the merrier.
Insecure firmware is probably not a problem if all devices are strictly isolated away to their own VLAN, which is carefully firewalled away from all your other systems (so even if you get a compromised laptop on your home LAN, it can't reach those cameras without going through a tightly locked down jumphost). Then it is more likely someone's throwing a wrench to a camera than someone hacking into it (even if all it takes is passwordless telnet that gives root access).
This can be done relatively pain-free with Ubiquiti with the added benefit of getting the full framerate recorded all the time instead of only during a detection.
It’s more expensive, but all recordings are local.
However, any time I try to view a feed and it lags or doesn’t connect, I swear I’m just gonna hard wire everything. Sometimes it’s nice to have one system I can’t tinker with.
https://ring.com/professional-monitoring
I mean besides making all the hams in the neighborhood mad at you.
I got locked out of my house for about 4 hours.
I set up a whole Mac-mini home assistant thing totally local.
Then I lost my phone and I couldn’t get in to the house to even call it. Thankfully it was just in my wife’s car and she came home with it.
Now there is a physical key under a rock.
So far the only failure mode has been the battery running out, but it gives you plenty of warning. And if you're super lazy like me, you just go in the other door when the battery runs out. :)
My door lock is wirelessly controllable via zwave.
It also has a keypad so you can just enter a code instead.
It also has a keyhole. For my key. That is with me.
Similarly… I have some controllable light switches. If anything fails… they are just normal light switches and I can still turn my lights on.
I’ve spent too long in IT to have any faith whatsoever in any of this stuff.
The door lock is HomeKit and does Bluetooth so it works when the power is out and internet is down, has a key and PIN code for backup.
Garage door opener requires the WiFi to be up, but it will work without internet if you’re close enough to connect to home WiFi.
HomeKit is far from perfect but I like that it doesn’t require internet for the core functions to work. Thread and Matter devices have made it even better.
https://github.com/koush/scrypted
I mirror my camera locally and also send it to HomeKitSecureVideo.