Ask HN: Why are everybody going back to hybrid? Did remote work fail?
It feels that pretty much all companies are going back to a hybrid model these days. There is a scarcity for remote jobs, at least in the Scandinavia.
Is this due to remote work model failing or the current weak economic climate or due to some other factors I am not considering?
I wish that working across the European borders should be more accessible than it is today.
https://archive.is/20230511110219/https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-remote-work-revolution-fail/#selection-1145.79-1149.214
7 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 22.7 ms ] threadThe good-faith argument. They say that by being in the office more often it will improve team cohesion and possibly improve productivity and even create more opportunities for cross-team connections (random meetings in the lunch hall, hallways, etc.).
The bad-faith argument. They've spent millions building out new office space for a workforce that was likely larger than it is now and to see it go unused would be a shame. Solution: mandatory 2-days in the office. Lol.
Pervasive sentiment that is repeated almost everywhere, but I am unsure is reflected in reality. For example, are you grifting? Is your spouse? Is your family?
Leaving aside self-reflection (that may perhaps break these delusions, which is why I asked), I am wondering how you think anything gets built or done if everyone is running a grift? For example, where did the computer you typed this one come from? How did your house spring into existence? What did you eat today?
I don't blame anyone for thinking this way because hyper-capitalism has created a lot of reasons for dissatisfaction and discontent. Is everything a grift though? No. Are there people who do that? The best examples I can think of that are relevant for the HN audience are Holmes and SBF. Without any evidence, I don't think it's fair or accurate to call someone a grifter, or assume that they are. It's not smart, clever or forward-thinking to be pessimistic if all you can do with that pessimism is create delusions.
> Is everything a grift though?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal%E2%80%93agent_proble...
Note I used the word "perception" three times in my comment.
"In mass communication, the important thing is not how things are but how they seem to be." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiio%27s_laws
Outsourcing has it's overheads, but even if hiring remote would be a better fit, most companies can't adapt fast, and for most companies that are not startups, few years are not that much time.
The best way to work remotely is to move a place with low cost of living, and bid on jobs from all over the world, in this case there are plenty of options to choose from.
If it only was that easy to land one of those few remote jobs out there. Honestly feels easier to earn money as an indiehacker than doing that.
“What workers want” (2021) https://greylock.com/greymatter/nicholas-bloom-stanford-what...