Ain't it the truth. But does anyone care? Not those who spread the debt over 10 or 20 years, not those who are heavily subsidized by grants, artificially low interest, or debt forgiven. Not those who can't understand the obtuse college bills. Not those who have no choice when low entry jobs require college degrees because high schools graduate illiterates. No end user cost shopping leads to spending like there's no tomorrow. At one state school campus I heard one student dean state matter of factly that she had thousands of employees reporting just to her. These were simply managers of various student group extracurriculars. What ???!
>>The spending is inextricably tied to the nation’s $1.6 trillion federal student debt crisis. Colleges poured out money in part by raising tuition prices, leaving many students with few options but to take on more debt. That means student loans served as easy financing for university projects.
Exactly. Get rid of and severely cut government subsidies, let the universities declare bankruptcy,cut useless administrative costs and staff, and lower their prices to match actual affordability equilibrium. We wouldn't have this problem if scholarships and loans were private and universities actually had to show a return on a student's investment to earn their attendence.
Administrators are spending like there's no tomorrow, sure -- but only on things that aggrandize their own reputation and domain. For a long while, administrators have been willing to curtail spending for attracting and retaining the best possible professors and the most promising researchers, including graduate students.
Spending more on things that will surely make administrators look, feel, and be more important: Yes. Investing on things that won't: No.
It’s absolutely insane how much of the spending is going into useless monuments rather than things that actually improve the educational experience.
And sometimes the reason is more sinister than just self aggrandization. I believe the President of at least 1 public college was found to have links with the construction companies that were awarded the contracts and was benefitting from handing them out.
My alma mater tried calling me for money. I asked the poor student on the phone how much he was being paid. He wasn't. So I asked him why I would want to pay more to a building that had already extracted a huge amount of money for not much gain.
They must be targeting 60 year old boomers with rose-tinted nostalgia of their youth.
The amount of waste and prioritization of administration goals over actual teaching and research turned me off from ever contributing back.
9 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 22.7 ms ] threadExactly. Get rid of and severely cut government subsidies, let the universities declare bankruptcy,cut useless administrative costs and staff, and lower their prices to match actual affordability equilibrium. We wouldn't have this problem if scholarships and loans were private and universities actually had to show a return on a student's investment to earn their attendence.
Spending more on things that will surely make administrators look, feel, and be more important: Yes. Investing on things that won't: No.
And sometimes the reason is more sinister than just self aggrandization. I believe the President of at least 1 public college was found to have links with the construction companies that were awarded the contracts and was benefitting from handing them out.
They must be targeting 60 year old boomers with rose-tinted nostalgia of their youth.
The amount of waste and prioritization of administration goals over actual teaching and research turned me off from ever contributing back.
There's all this random crap that the school somehow has money to fund, it's insane.
Student loans that cannot be defaulted on.