You wouldn't necessarily want to lose broken bookmarks. Metadata might be useful. They might be in an online archive. And you might be able to search for the link to find people who link to it for associated information.
Exactly, I use scripts to flag them up, and then manually appraise whether it's important enough to replace with an archive.org link, search to see if the data has shifted elsewhere (douglas self's site has gone through many such transformations in my bookmarks since the mid-90s) or just delete it.
I stopped using bookmarks when I discovered "Tabs Outliner" extension for Chrome, and now I can't imagine using any browser that doesn't work like that. It automatically saves your browser sessions as you go, you can name them and close and return to it at any time, without having to remember to update your bookmarks or save anything. I can't really do it justice in a sentence or two, but it's great.
13 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 52.1 ms ] threadFew good ones - https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-we-made-250000-appsumo-er... https://www.byfounders.vc/insights/minimum-viable-distributi... https://highspark.co/startup-pitch-deck-examples/
Without Stacks, they would be sitting somewhere in an obscure folder of my browser bookmark list
Everyday
Many times researching things I get hundred tabs open, and no time to collate the relevant results, I just bookmark everything into unsorted
Then on repeated visits I give them some tags
Also use extension to highlight bookmarks https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/bookmark-high...
Any kind of better bookmark management is definetly welcome