Show HN: Anonymize HN – a Chrome extension to anonymize Hacker News users (chrome.google.com)
I wrote a small Chrome extension that allows the user to replace all usernames on Hacker News with either the string `anonymous` or a deterministic hashed value.
61 comments
[ 3.5 ms ] story [ 116 ms ] thread[1] - https://letsblock.it/filters/tag/hackernews
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37122006
Don’t get me started on all the Ivy League circle jerking that goes on here. Again, I didn’t have the privilege to go to an incredible school. And yet, I have now worked with many who did and found not much there, aside from wealthy friends and overconfidence.
also the occasional founder/CEO who may comment on some story related to their company
https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=rsc
https://swtch.com/~rsc
Also Rich Harris, creator of Svelte and SvelteKit:
https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=rich_harris
Redis creator chimes in from time to time:
https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=antirez
There are more I'm sure.
https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=josevalim
I follow F1 and I imagine Lewis Hamilton and how he spends his day. He has better things to do than to chime in on F1 forums.
It is as simple as that, people that are famous for achieving things are not going to waste their time on forums.
What I do find amusing is how many HN extensions there are in the Chrome store. If I was at university then I would write one too - the simplicity of the format begs for some styling and whatnot.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36931617
https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=PaulDavisThe1st
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Davis_(programmer)
I really love hearing him speak, particularly when he loses it and rants against stuff (bonus points if “stuff” is Oracle)
I bet if HN went forced anon, it wouldn't make much of a difference in posting and upvoting patterns.
I would definitely use this extension if it were written for a real browser instead of googlestuff. It wouldn't help with others behaving based on identity but I like the idea.
The only time I ever look at someone's post history is if they are interesting, insightful, or famous(ish) (and use their real name).
I don't do it on my end, though. I really only care about what was said, and I'm addressing anyone who is reading.
I honestly would drop the word "you" from all of my replies, except sometimes things can sound ruder when I drop it than when I don't. Like criticizing in the third-person somebody standing right in front of you.
But I could also see myself being in a minority and the effect of the gray is compounding. So seeing some data would be really interesting.
- https://github.com/roshan/hnncnn (no comments and usernames on the front page)
- https://stylometry.net/ (no longer works, but stylometry for various HN users - it was pretty good!)
It creates special patterns: cryptic references to spot non-initiates, people role-playing a straw man and replying to themselves, shunning people using confirmed user names, etc. There is jargon for all of this but it is too offensive for this venue.
[1] https://kidger.site
I certainly don't associate people with their previous comments on HN.
https://news.ycombinator.com/leaders
I recognize some recurring usernames, but don't necessarily associate them with anything outside the context of HN.
If you asked me to name them though I wouldn't be able to, but when I see their comments I remember them. Interesting how that works.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30668137
https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/441566-hn-avatars-in-396-b...
Description:
The concept is to use HN usernames as the seed into a deterministic avatar generator. This generator is built from the famously simple xorshift32 PRNG, which both provides a random variable for the image generator steps, and "pseudo-hashes" the seed string to provide the initial PRNG state using a non-linear step (adding each codepoint - which is likely not very robust against collisions compared to proper hashing algorithms, but is simple and good enough).
And do away with the username, but still keep an avatar based on their username to make it easier to follow the flow of a thread.
Basically turns it into 4Chan with tripcodes. Technically you can re-use your tripcode but the community there really really looks down on doing that (or used to, I haven't been there in something like a decade).
The tree within HN is "post > thread > comment", no?
There is a lot of use in having the same avatar within threads and across threads, but I don't see much use in having the same avatar across posts. All it leads to is point farming, echo chambering and bandwagoning.
Many times I see well-known users with recognizable usernames offer insightful comments. They are very knowledgeable, well-informed and polite. Many times however, if someone else dares to go against this user with an equally valid well-informed polite countercomment, groupies of said recognizable user will nuke those comments into deep grey, purely because it goes against their god and he must be right.
You see this across all subcommunities that have a point system and usernames. People lose sight of the content and will blindly follow whoever is the most well-known person within that community.
Something like Reddit, but with the value-judging system of imageboards would be a godsend.
Counter-point: being downvoted maybe isn't so bad? I'd rather express my (controversial) opinion and be downvoted than stay quiet to avoid scrutiny. Being a person out in the world means sometimes being criticised.